Guinea vs Norway Comparison

Country Comparison
Guinea Flag

Guinea

15.1M (2025)

VS
Norway Flag

Norway

5.6M (2025)

Comprehensive comparison across 9 categories and 44 indicators

Loading countries...

No countries found

Loading countries...

No countries found
Guinea Flag

Guinea

Population: 15.1M (2025) Area: 245.9K km² GDP: $30.1B (2025)
Capital: Conakry
Continent: Africa
Official Languages: French
Currency: GNF
HDI: 0.500 (179.)
Norway Flag

Norway

Population: 5.6M (2025) Area: 323.8K km² GDP: $504.3B (2025)
Capital: Oslo
Continent: Europe
Official Languages: Norwegian
Currency: NOK
HDI: 0.970 (2.)

Geography and Demographics

Guinea
Norway
Area
245.9K km²
323.8K km²
Total population
15.1M (2025)
5.6M (2025)
Population density
61.3 people/km² (2025)
15 people/km² (2025)
Average age
No data
39.8 (2025)

Economy and Finance

Guinea
Norway
Total GDP
$30.1B (2025)
$504.3B (2025)
GDP per capita
$1,900 (2025)
$89,690 (2025)
Inflation rate
3.5% (2025)
2.6% (2025)
Growth rate
7.1% (2025)
2.1% (2025)
Minimum wage
$80 (2024)
No data
Tourism revenue
No data
$9.4B (2025)
Unemployment rate
No data
4.0% (2025)
Public debt
40.7% (2025)
56.3% (2025)
Trade balance
$684 (2025)
$4.4K (2025)

Quality of Life and Health

Guinea
Norway
Human development
0.500 (179.)
0.970 (2.)
Happiness index
4,929 (102.)
7,262 (7.)
Health Exp. per Cap. ($)
$55 (4%)
$8.7K (7.9%)
Life expectancy
61.1 (2025)
83.6 (2025)
Safety index
47.5 (160.)
93.2 (5.)

Education and Technology

Guinea
Norway
Education Exp. (% GDP)
1.6% (2025)
4.1% (2025)
Literacy rate
42.5% (2025)
No data
Primary school completion
42.5% (2025)
No data
Internet usage
31.3% (2025)
99.7% (2025)
Internet speed
No data
164.33 Mbps (37.)

Environment and Sustainability

Guinea
Norway
Renewable energy
66.0% (2025)
98.4% (2025)
Carbon emissions per capita
4 kg per capita (2025)
44 kg per capita (2025)
Forest area
24.8% (2025)
33.5% (2025)
Freshwater resources
226 km³ (2025)
393 km³ (2025)
Air quality
38.76 µg/m³ PM2.5 (2025)
5.61 µg/m³ PM2.5 (2025)

Military Power

Guinea
Norway
Military expenditure
$506.2M (2025)
$12.1B (2025)
Military power rank
500 (135.)
19,773 (34.)

Governance and Politics

Guinea
Norway
Democracy index
2.04 (2024)
9.81 (2024)
Corruption perception
28 (137.)
83 (8.)
Political stability
-0.8 (142.)
0.8 (56.)
Press freedom
58.8 (65.)
92.4 (1.)

Infrastructure and Services

Guinea
Norway
Clean water access
71.5% (2025)
100.0% (2025)
Electricity access
52.8% (2025)
100.0% (2025)
Electricity price
0.16 $/kWh (2025)
0.16 $/kWh (2025)
Paved Roads
No data
80 % (2025)
Traffic deaths (per 100K)
29.54 /100K (2025)
1.63 /100K (2025)
Retirement age
55 (2025)
67 (2025)

Tourism and International Relations

Guinea
Norway
Passport power
40.59 (2025)
90.75 (2025)
Tourist arrivals
99K (2017)
5M (2022)
Tourism revenue
No data
$9.4B (2025)
World heritage sites
1 (2025)
8 (2025)

Comparison Result

Guinea
Guinea Flag
5.5

Superior Fields

Leader
Norway
Norway
Norway Flag
29.5

Superior Fields

* This score reflects overall livability and quality of life, not just economic or military strength

GDP Comparison

Total GDP

$30.1B (2025)
Guinea
vs
$504.3B (2025)
Norway
Difference: %1576

GDP per Capita

$1,900 (2025)
Guinea
vs
$89,690 (2025)
Norway
Difference: %4621

Comparison Evaluation

Guinea Flag

Guinea Evaluation

While Guinea ranks lower overall compared to Norway, specific areas demonstrate competitive advantages:

Guinea excels in: • Guinea has 4.1x higher population density • Guinea has 3.2x higher birth rate • Guinea has 2.7x higher population
Norway Flag

Norway Evaluation

Key advantages for Norway: • Norway has 47.2x higher GDP per capita • Norway has 16.8x higher GDP • Norway has 158.1x higher healthcare spending per capita • Norway has 6.4x higher trade balance

Overall Evaluation

Final Conclusion

The Polished Gem vs. The Raw Mineral: A Tale of Potential and Reality

Two Stories of Natural Wealth

Comparing Norway and Guinea is like contrasting a perfectly cut and polished diamond, displayed in a brightly lit, secure museum, with a vast, unexplored mountain range known to contain rich veins of the same precious mineral. The Norwegian diamond is a symbol of realized value—its wealth extracted, refined, and used to create something of breathtaking quality. The Guinean mountain range is a symbol of immense, raw, and largely untapped potential, its wealth still locked within the earth.

Guinea possesses the world's largest reserves of bauxite (the ore used to make aluminum) and significant deposits of iron ore, gold, and diamonds. Yet, it remains one of the poorest countries in the world, a stark example of the "resource curse."

The Most Striking Contrasts

  • Resource Management: Norway is the global model for translating resource wealth (oil) into universal prosperity and stability. Guinea is a classic case of the "paradox of plenty," where immense mineral wealth has failed to translate into development due to a history of poor governance, corruption, and political instability.
  • Political History: Norway has a long history of stable, peaceful democracy. Guinea has a turbulent political history, from a harsh post-independence socialist dictatorship to a series of military coups, which has crippled its ability to build strong institutions.
  • Infrastructure: Norway has world-class infrastructure connecting its entire population. Guinea has extremely poor infrastructure, which makes it difficult to extract and export its mineral wealth efficiently and to provide basic services to its people.
  • Environmental Landscape: Norway is a cold, coastal nation of fjords. Guinea is a tropical West African nation with four distinct geographic regions: a coastal plain, mountainous highlands (the Fouta Djallon, the "water tower of West Africa"), savanna, and rainforest.

The Paradox of Wealth: From the Ground to the People

The core paradox is simple: why is the country with arguably more diverse and valuable solid mineral wealth so much poorer than the one with oil? The answer lies not in the ground, but in what happens above it. Norway built robust, transparent institutions *before* its oil boom, ensuring the wealth would be managed for the public. Guinea’s history of weak and unstable governance meant that when its resources became valuable, the systems were not in place to manage the wealth for the benefit of all.

Practical Advice

If You Want to Start a Business:
  • Choose Norway for: A predictable, safe, and transparent market ideal for nearly any business.
  • Choose Guinea for: High-risk, high-reward ventures in the mining sector. Operating in Guinea requires immense capital, political savvy, and the ability to navigate an extremely challenging and unstable environment.
If You Want to Settle Down:
  • Norway is for you if: You seek safety, stability, a high standard of living, and a strong social safety net.
  • Guinea is for you if: You are a mining engineer, a development professional, or a public health expert on a mission with a major international organization. It is not a destination for casual settlement.

Tourism Experience

Norway offers: A seamless and stunning tourism experience, accessible to all.

Guinea offers: Incredible, raw natural beauty for the most adventurous of travelers. Explore the highlands of the Fouta Djallon, with its waterfalls and hiking trails. However, the lack of infrastructure makes travel extremely difficult and it remains one of West Africa's least-visited destinations.

Conclusion: The Blueprint and the Challenge

Norway provides the world with a blueprint for how to turn natural resources into national success. It is a story of what can go right.

Guinea presents the world with a profound challenge. It is a story of what can go wrong, and a crucial test case for whether a nation so rich in potential can overcome its history of instability to finally unlock its wealth for its people. The potential is so vast, it is a tragedy of global proportions that it remains unrealized.

🏆 Final Verdict: By every conceivable metric of human and economic development, Norway is a global leader. The immense, untapped potential of Guinea makes it a place of great hope but also profound frustration. The world needs Guinea's resources for the green transition (aluminum, iron), making its future stability a matter of global interest.

Final Word: Norway shows the value of good governance. Guinea shows the cost of its absence.

💡 Surprising Fact: Norway's wealth comes from offshore oil, a resource it began exploiting in the 1970s. Guinea is the source of three of West Africa's most important rivers (the Niger, the Senegal, and the Gambia), giving it the nickname "the water tower of West Africa." One nation's wealth flows from under the sea; the other's flows from its mountains to sustain its neighbors.

Other Country Comparisons

Data Disclaimer: Projected data (future years) are estimates based on mathematical models. Actual values may differ. Learn about our methodology →

Data Sources

Comparison data is aggregated from multiple authoritative international organizations:

World Bank Open Data - Development and economic indicators
UN Data - Population and demographic statistics
IMF Data Portal - International financial statistics
WHO Data - Global health statistics
OECD Statistics - Economic and social data
Our Methodology - Learn how we process and analyze data

Comments (0)

You must log in to comment

Log In