Norway vs South Sudan Comparison

Country Comparison
Norway Flag

Norway

5.6M (2025)

VS
South Sudan Flag

South Sudan

12.2M (2025)

Comprehensive comparison across 9 categories and 44 indicators

Loading countries...

No countries found

Loading countries...

No countries found
Norway Flag

Norway

Population: 5.6M (2025) Area: 323.8K km² GDP: $504.3B (2025)
Capital: Oslo
Continent: Europe
Official Languages: Norwegian
Currency: NOK
HDI: 0.970 (2.)
South Sudan Flag

South Sudan

Population: 12.2M (2025) Area: 644.3K km² GDP: $4B (2025)
Capital: Juba
Continent: Africa
Official Languages: English
Currency: SSP
HDI: 0.388 (193.)

Geography and Demographics

Norway
South Sudan
Area
323.8K km²
644.3K km²
Total population
5.6M (2025)
12.2M (2025)
Population density
15 people/km² (2025)
13.2 people/km² (2025)
Average age
39.8 (2025)
18.7 (2025)

Economy and Finance

Norway
South Sudan
Total GDP
$504.3B (2025)
$4B (2025)
GDP per capita
$89,690 (2025)
$251 (2025)
Inflation rate
2.6% (2025)
65.7% (2025)
Growth rate
2.1% (2025)
-4.3% (2025)
Minimum wage
No data
No data
Tourism revenue
$9.4B (2025)
$10M (2025)
Unemployment rate
4.0% (2025)
12.4% (2025)
Public debt
56.3% (2025)
No data
Trade balance
$4.4K (2025)
No data

Quality of Life and Health

Norway
South Sudan
Human development
0.970 (2.)
0.388 (193.)
Happiness index
7,262 (7.)
No data
Health Exp. per Cap. ($)
$8.7K (7.9%)
$49 (7%)
Life expectancy
83.6 (2025)
57.9 (2025)
Safety index
93.2 (5.)
32.1 (182.)

Education and Technology

Norway
South Sudan
Education Exp. (% GDP)
4.1% (2025)
No data
Literacy rate
No data
35.5% (2025)
Primary school completion
No data
35.5% (2025)
Internet usage
99.7% (2025)
10.8% (2025)
Internet speed
164.33 Mbps (37.)
No data

Environment and Sustainability

Norway
South Sudan
Renewable energy
98.4% (2025)
19.4% (2025)
Carbon emissions per capita
44 kg per capita (2025)
No data
Forest area
33.5% (2025)
11.3% (2025)
Freshwater resources
393 km³ (2025)
50 km³ (2025)
Air quality
5.61 µg/m³ PM2.5 (2025)
26.56 µg/m³ PM2.5 (2025)

Military Power

Norway
South Sudan
Military expenditure
$12.1B (2025)
$741.6M (2025)
Military power rank
19,773 (34.)
6,864 (63.)

Governance and Politics

Norway
South Sudan
Democracy index
9.81 (2024)
No data
Corruption perception
83 (8.)
9 (173.)
Political stability
0.8 (56.)
-2.1 (185.)
Press freedom
92.4 (1.)
44.2 (120.)

Infrastructure and Services

Norway
South Sudan
Clean water access
100.0% (2025)
41.2% (2025)
Electricity access
100.0% (2025)
9.9% (2025)
Electricity price
0.16 $/kWh (2025)
0.3 $/kWh (2025)
Paved Roads
80 % (2025)
No data
Traffic deaths (per 100K)
1.63 /100K (2025)
39.9 /100K (2025)
Retirement age
67 (2025)
No data

Tourism and International Relations

Norway
South Sudan
Passport power
90.75 (2025)
34.16 (2025)
Tourist arrivals
5M (2022)
No data
Tourism revenue
$9.4B (2025)
$10M (2025)
World heritage sites
8 (2025)
0 (2025)

Comparison Result

Norway
Norway Flag
27.0

Superior Fields

Leader
Norway
South Sudan
South Sudan Flag
4.0

Superior Fields

* This score reflects overall livability and quality of life, not just economic or military strength

GDP Comparison

Total GDP

$504.3B (2025)
Norway
vs
$4B (2025)
South Sudan
Difference: %12507

GDP per Capita

$89,690 (2025)
Norway
vs
$251 (2025)
South Sudan
Difference: %35633

Comparison Evaluation

Norway Flag

Norway Evaluation

Norway outperforms with: • Norway has 357.3x higher GDP per capita • Norway has 126.1x higher GDP • Norway has 177.4x higher healthcare spending per capita • Norway has 9.2x higher corruption perception index
South Sudan Flag

South Sudan Evaluation

While South Sudan ranks lower overall compared to Norway, specific areas demonstrate competitive advantages:

South Sudan outperforms in: • South Sudan has 2.9x higher birth rate • South Sudan has 2.2x higher population • South Sudan has 99% higher land area

Overall Evaluation

Final Conclusion

Norway vs. South Sudan: The Oldest Peace vs. The Newest Nation

A Tale of Established Tranquility and a Difficult Birth

To compare Norway and South Sudan is to contrast one of the world's most established and peaceful nations with the world's youngest, a country forged in a long and brutal struggle for independence. Norway is a finished, polished model of statehood, enjoying the fruits of centuries of stability. South Sudan, which gained independence in 2011, is a nation rich in potential but grappling with the immense challenges of building a country from scratch amidst internal conflict and humanitarian crises.

The Starkest Contrasts

  • Nationhood & History: Norway has a long, stable history as a nation-state, a global symbol of peace. South Sudan is the world's newest country, born from decades of civil war with Sudan, and its short history has been marred by its own internal conflicts.
  • Peace & Stability: Norway is consistently ranked among the most peaceful countries on Earth. South Sudan has been plagued by violence for most of its existence, both before and after independence, leading to one of the world's worst humanitarian crises.
  • Economic Foundation: Norway's economy is a diversified, high-tech powerhouse with a massive, well-managed oil fund. South Sudan's economy is almost entirely dependent on oil revenues, but conflict and lack of infrastructure have crippled its ability to use this wealth for development.
  • Development Indicators: Norway sits at the top of the UN Human Development Index, with world-class health and education systems. South Sudan sits at the very bottom, with some of the worst indicators for literacy, life expectancy, and infant mortality in the world.

The Quality vs. Quantity Paradox

This comparison transcends the "quality vs. quantity" framework. Norway represents the absolute peak of "quality" in life, governance, and security. South Sudan is in a fight for its very survival, where the most basic "quantity"—the number of people with access to food, clean water, and safety—is the daily challenge. The "quality" that exists is in the incredible resilience of its diverse peoples, like the Dinka and Nuer, and the "quantity" of its untapped cultural and natural heritage remains immense, but largely inaccessible.

Practical Advice

If You Want to Start a Business:

  • Norway is for you if: You are in virtually any field and value stability and a highly skilled workforce.
  • South Sudan is for you if: You are in humanitarian aid, security, or basic logistics. It is an environment for mission-driven organizations, not for conventional business.

If You Want to Settle Down:

  • Norway is your choice for: A safe, secure, and prosperous life. It is a global benchmark for family life.
  • South Sudan is your choice for: This is not a destination for expatriate settlement. It is a posting for the most dedicated diplomats, aid workers, and peacekeepers working in extreme and hazardous conditions.

The Tourist Experience

  • Norway offers: A safe, comfortable, and majestic journey through stunning, accessible landscapes.
  • South Sudan offers: No tourist infrastructure. It is one of the most dangerous countries in the world to visit. Its vast wetlands (the Sudd) and incredible wildlife migrations are of immense ecological importance but are effectively off-limits.

Conclusion: Which World Do You Choose?

This is a choice between a nation that has reached the destination and a nation that has just begun the most arduous journey imaginable. Norway is a testament to the rewards of lasting peace. South Sudan is a stark reminder of the profound difficulty of building it. One is a quiet harbor; the other is a storm at sea.

🏆 The Final Verdict

Winner: This is not a meaningful competition. Norway has won the lottery of history and geography. The victory for South Sudan will be achieving a lasting peace that allows its people to begin building the nation they fought so long and hard for.

Practical Decision: One lives a peaceful life in Norway. One works in South Sudan out of a profound sense of duty and a hope to alleviate suffering and help build a future.

💡 The Surprise Fact

South Sudan is home to the Sudd, one of the world's largest wetlands and tropical peatlands, a globally significant ecosystem. It is also the site of one of the largest land mammal migrations on Earth. This incredible natural wealth stands in stark, tragic contrast to the human suffering that has defined the nation's early years.

Other Country Comparisons

Data Disclaimer: Projected data (future years) are estimates based on mathematical models. Actual values may differ. Learn about our methodology →

Data Sources

Comparison data is aggregated from multiple authoritative international organizations:

World Bank Open Data - Development and economic indicators
UN Data - Population and demographic statistics
IMF Data Portal - International financial statistics
WHO Data - Global health statistics
OECD Statistics - Economic and social data
Our Methodology - Learn how we process and analyze data

Comments (0)

You must log in to comment

Log In