South Sudan vs Sweden Comparison

Country Comparison
South Sudan Flag

South Sudan

12.2M (2025)

VS
Sweden Flag

Sweden

10.7M (2025)

Comprehensive comparison across 9 categories and 44 indicators

Loading countries...

No countries found

Loading countries...

No countries found
South Sudan Flag

South Sudan

Population: 12.2M (2025) Area: 644.3K km² GDP: $4B (2025)
Capital: Juba
Continent: Africa
Official Languages: English
Currency: SSP
HDI: 0.388 (193.)
Sweden Flag

Sweden

Population: 10.7M (2025) Area: 450.3K km² GDP: $620.3B (2025)
Capital: Stockholm
Continent: Europe
Official Languages: Swedish
Currency: SEK
HDI: 0.959 (5.)

Geography and Demographics

South Sudan
Sweden
Area
644.3K km²
450.3K km²
Total population
12.2M (2025)
10.7M (2025)
Population density
13.2 people/km² (2025)
26.4 people/km² (2025)
Average age
18.7 (2025)
40.3 (2025)

Economy and Finance

South Sudan
Sweden
Total GDP
$4B (2025)
$620.3B (2025)
GDP per capita
$251 (2025)
$58,100 (2025)
Inflation rate
65.7% (2025)
2.1% (2025)
Growth rate
-4.3% (2025)
1.9% (2025)
Minimum wage
No data
No data
Tourism revenue
$10M (2025)
$17B (2025)
Unemployment rate
12.4% (2025)
8.5% (2025)
Public debt
No data
34.7% (2025)
Trade balance
No data
$629 (2025)

Quality of Life and Health

South Sudan
Sweden
Human development
0.388 (193.)
0.959 (5.)
Happiness index
No data
7,345 (4.)
Health Exp. per Cap. ($)
$49 (7%)
$6.2K (10.9%)
Life expectancy
57.9 (2025)
83.6 (2025)
Safety index
32.1 (182.)
90.5 (14.)

Education and Technology

South Sudan
Sweden
Education Exp. (% GDP)
No data
7.6% (2025)
Literacy rate
35.5% (2025)
No data
Primary school completion
35.5% (2025)
No data
Internet usage
10.8% (2025)
96.7% (2025)
Internet speed
No data
186.86 Mbps (28.)

Environment and Sustainability

South Sudan
Sweden
Renewable energy
19.4% (2025)
80.3% (2025)
Carbon emissions per capita
No data
35 kg per capita (2025)
Forest area
11.3% (2025)
68.7% (2025)
Freshwater resources
50 km³ (2025)
174 km³ (2025)
Air quality
26.56 µg/m³ PM2.5 (2025)
5.06 µg/m³ PM2.5 (2025)

Military Power

South Sudan
Sweden
Military expenditure
$741.6M (2025)
$15.6B (2025)
Military power rank
6,864 (63.)
22,869 (32.)

Governance and Politics

South Sudan
Sweden
Democracy index
No data
9.39 (2024)
Corruption perception
9 (173.)
81 (8.)
Political stability
-2.1 (185.)
0.8 (56.)
Press freedom
44.2 (120.)
88 (5.)

Infrastructure and Services

South Sudan
Sweden
Clean water access
41.2% (2025)
100.0% (2025)
Electricity access
9.9% (2025)
100.0% (2025)
Electricity price
0.3 $/kWh (2025)
0.17 $/kWh (2025)
Paved Roads
No data
71 % (2025)
Traffic deaths (per 100K)
39.9 /100K (2025)
2.87 /100K (2025)
Retirement age
No data
No data

Tourism and International Relations

South Sudan
Sweden
Passport power
34.16 (2025)
91.19 (2025)
Tourist arrivals
No data
6.6M (2022)
Tourism revenue
$10M (2025)
$17B (2025)
World heritage sites
0 (2025)
15 (2025)

Comparison Result

South Sudan
South Sudan Flag
4.0

Superior Fields

Leader
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden Flag
27.0

Superior Fields

* This score reflects overall livability and quality of life, not just economic or military strength

GDP Comparison

Total GDP

$4B (2025)
South Sudan
vs
$620.3B (2025)
Sweden
Difference: %15408

GDP per Capita

$251 (2025)
South Sudan
vs
$58,100 (2025)
Sweden
Difference: %23047

Comparison Evaluation

South Sudan Flag

South Sudan Evaluation

While South Sudan ranks lower overall compared to Sweden, specific areas demonstrate competitive advantages:

South Sudan performs well in: • South Sudan has 2.8x higher birth rate • South Sudan has 43% higher land area
Sweden Flag

Sweden Evaluation

Sweden outperforms with: • Sweden has 231.5x higher GDP per capita • Sweden has 155.1x higher GDP • Sweden has 125.6x higher healthcare spending per capita • Sweden has 9.0x higher corruption perception index

Overall Evaluation

Final Conclusion

Sweden vs. South Sudan: The Architect of Peace vs. The Child of Struggle

A Tale of an Ancient Kingdom and a Nation in Infancy

Comparing Sweden and South Sudan is perhaps the most extreme contrast possible in the family of nations. It’s like comparing a centuries-old, perfectly maintained cathedral to the first foundation stones of a building just laid in a storm. Sweden is one of the world’s oldest, most peaceful, and most developed states. South Sudan is the world’s newest country, born in 2011 from decades of conflict and still grappling with the fundamental challenges of nation-building.

The Most Striking Contrasts

  • Age and Stability: Sweden has existed as a kingdom for over a millennium and has not been at war for over 200 years. South Sudan is just over a decade old, and its short existence has been marred by a devastating civil war. One is a synonym for stability; the other for fragility.
  • Institutional Depth: Sweden’s institutions (parliament, courts, social services) are ancient, complex, and deeply embedded in society. South Sudan is building these institutions from scratch, a monumental task in a country with limited resources and deep ethnic divisions.
  • Economic Reality: Sweden is a post-industrial, high-tech economy with one of the world’s highest GDPs per capita. South Sudan has an oil-dependent, subsistence-agriculture economy, with some of the lowest human development indicators on the planet. Its wealth is potential (oil, fertile land), not realized.
  • Life Expectancy: A child born in Sweden can expect to live well into their 80s, with access to world-class healthcare. A child born in South Sudan has one of the lowest life expectancies in the world, often struggling to reach their 60s, with access to basic healthcare being a daily struggle.

The Paradox of What Is vs. What Could Be

Sweden represents the finished product of the nation-state project. It has achieved the goals of peace, prosperity, and welfare that most countries aspire to. Its main challenge is to maintain this high standard in a changing world.

South Sudan is a land of immense, tragic paradox. It is one of the most oil-rich and fertile countries in Africa, a place of enormous potential. Yet, conflict, displacement, and lack of infrastructure have left it unable to harness this wealth for its people. Its story is a painful gap between what is and what could be.

Practical Advice

If You Want to Start a Business:

  • Sweden is for you if: You need stability, a skilled workforce, and a predictable market. Your business is in almost any modern sector, especially tech and green solutions.
  • South Sudan is for you if: You are not a typical entrepreneur. You are likely an investor in the oil sector, a logistics expert working for NGOs, or a specialist in post-conflict development. The risks are astronomical.

If You Want to Settle Down:

  • Sweden is your choice for: A safe, secure life with unparalleled social benefits for you and your family. It is the definition of a stable place to call home.
  • South Sudan is your choice for: This is not a destination for settlement. Life for expatriates is almost exclusively confined to those working for international organizations, diplomatic missions, or in the security sector, and it is lived in secure compounds with significant hardship postings.

The Tourist Experience

Sweden offers polished, safe, and diverse tourism options, from its vibrant cities to its tranquil nature. It is accessible and comfortable for all travelers.South Sudan has no tourist industry. The country is considered one of the most dangerous travel destinations in the world. However, it is home to the world’s second-largest animal migration and vast, untouched ecosystems, a hint of a future potential that feels heartbreakingly distant.

Conclusion: Two Ends of the Human Story

Sweden and South Sudan are not just two different countries; they represent two different stages of human history living in the same moment. Sweden is a society that has largely conquered the traditional threats of poverty, war, and disease. South Sudan is a society where those threats are the reality of daily life.

🏆 The Final Verdict: This is not a competition. Sweden is a model of what humanity can build over centuries of peace. South Sudan is a stark reminder of how fragile that achievement is and the immense struggle required to even begin the journey.

The Practical Decision: People move to Sweden to live the best version of the modern world. People go to South Sudan to help, to witness, and to work on the front lines of humanity’s most difficult challenges.

The Last Word: To be born in Sweden is to win the lottery of life. To be born in South Sudan is to be given the challenge of building a nation from the ground up.

💡 Surprise Fact: Sweden is a major global donor of humanitarian aid, and a significant portion of that aid is directed towards countries like South Sudan. The destinies of these two profoundly different nations are, in a small but meaningful way, intertwined.

Other Country Comparisons

Data Disclaimer: Projected data (future years) are estimates based on mathematical models. Actual values may differ. Learn about our methodology →

Data Sources

Comparison data is aggregated from multiple authoritative international organizations:

World Bank Open Data - Development and economic indicators
UN Data - Population and demographic statistics
IMF Data Portal - International financial statistics
WHO Data - Global health statistics
OECD Statistics - Economic and social data
Our Methodology - Learn how we process and analyze data

Comments (0)

You must log in to comment

Log In