South Sudan vs Zambia Comparison

Country Comparison
South Sudan Flag

South Sudan

12.2M (2025)

VS
Zambia Flag

Zambia

21.9M (2025)

Comprehensive comparison across 9 categories and 44 indicators

Loading countries...

No countries found

Loading countries...

No countries found
South Sudan Flag

South Sudan

Population: 12.2M (2025) Area: 644.3K km² GDP: $4B (2025)
Capital: Juba
Continent: Africa
Official Languages: English
Currency: SSP
HDI: 0.388 (193.)
Zambia Flag

Zambia

Population: 21.9M (2025) Area: 752.6K km² GDP: $28.9B (2025)
Capital: Lusaka
Continent: Africa
Official Languages: English
Currency: ZMW
HDI: 0.595 (154.)

Geography and Demographics

South Sudan
Zambia
Area
644.3K km²
752.6K km²
Total population
12.2M (2025)
21.9M (2025)
Population density
13.2 people/km² (2025)
27.5 people/km² (2025)
Average age
18.7 (2025)
17.9 (2025)

Economy and Finance

South Sudan
Zambia
Total GDP
$4B (2025)
$28.9B (2025)
GDP per capita
$251 (2025)
$1,330 (2025)
Inflation rate
65.7% (2025)
14.2% (2025)
Growth rate
-4.3% (2025)
6.2% (2025)
Minimum wage
No data
$150 (2024)
Tourism revenue
$10M (2025)
$200M (2025)
Unemployment rate
12.4% (2025)
5.9% (2025)
Public debt
No data
71.7% (2025)
Trade balance
No data
$18 (2025)

Quality of Life and Health

South Sudan
Zambia
Human development
0.388 (193.)
0.595 (154.)
Happiness index
No data
3,912 (131.)
Health Exp. per Cap. ($)
$49 (7%)
$76 (5%)
Life expectancy
57.9 (2025)
66.7 (2025)
Safety index
32.1 (182.)
52.8 (143.)

Education and Technology

South Sudan
Zambia
Education Exp. (% GDP)
No data
4.0% (2025)
Literacy rate
35.5% (2025)
69.1% (2025)
Primary school completion
35.5% (2025)
72.9% (2025)
Internet usage
10.8% (2025)
37.3% (2025)
Internet speed
No data
32.07 Mbps (122.)

Environment and Sustainability

South Sudan
Zambia
Renewable energy
19.4% (2025)
86.9% (2025)
Carbon emissions per capita
No data
8 kg per capita (2025)
Forest area
11.3% (2025)
59.3% (2025)
Freshwater resources
50 km³ (2025)
105 km³ (2025)
Air quality
26.56 µg/m³ PM2.5 (2025)
24.88 µg/m³ PM2.5 (2025)

Military Power

South Sudan
Zambia
Military expenditure
$741.6M (2025)
$433M (2025)
Military power rank
6,864 (63.)
858 (121.)

Governance and Politics

South Sudan
Zambia
Democracy index
No data
5.73 (2024)
Corruption perception
9 (173.)
38 (90.)
Political stability
-2.1 (185.)
0.2 (91.)
Press freedom
44.2 (120.)
55.3 (76.)

Infrastructure and Services

South Sudan
Zambia
Clean water access
41.2% (2025)
68.2% (2025)
Electricity access
9.9% (2025)
50.8% (2025)
Electricity price
0.3 $/kWh (2025)
0.08 $/kWh (2025)
Paved Roads
No data
No data
Traffic deaths (per 100K)
39.9 /100K (2025)
20.37 /100K (2025)
Retirement age
No data
55 (2025)

Tourism and International Relations

South Sudan
Zambia
Passport power
34.16 (2025)
43.45 (2025)
Tourist arrivals
No data
502K (2020)
Tourism revenue
$10M (2025)
$200M (2025)
World heritage sites
0 (2025)
1 (2025)

Comparison Result

South Sudan
South Sudan Flag
3.0

Superior Fields

Leader
Zambia
Zambia
Zambia Flag
30.0

Superior Fields

* This score reflects overall livability and quality of life, not just economic or military strength

GDP Comparison

Total GDP

$4B (2025)
South Sudan
vs
$28.9B (2025)
Zambia
Difference: %623

GDP per Capita

$251 (2025)
South Sudan
vs
$1,330 (2025)
Zambia
Difference: %430

Comparison Evaluation

South Sudan Flag

South Sudan Evaluation

While South Sudan ranks lower overall compared to Zambia, specific areas demonstrate competitive advantages:

South Sudan outperforms in: • South Sudan has 71% higher military spending
Zambia Flag

Zambia Evaluation

Primary strengths of Zambia: • Zambia has 7.2x higher GDP • Zambia has 5.3x higher GDP per capita • Zambia has 4.2x higher corruption perception index • Zambia has 5.2x higher forest coverage

Overall Evaluation

Final Conclusion

South Sudan vs. Zambia: The Oil State and The Copper Kingdom

A Tale of Two Landlocked Nations, Two Different Fortunes

Comparing South Sudan and Zambia is a study in the destinies of two landlocked African nations, each blessed and cursed by a single, dominant natural resource. It's like comparing a new oil baron, flush with cash but living in a chaotic, unfinished mansion (South Sudan), to an old copper magnate living in a more established, orderly house that needs renovation (Zambia). Both are rich in potential, but their paths to prosperity have been vastly different.

The Most Striking Contrasts

  • The Blessing of Peace: Zambia is renowned for its long history of peace and political stability since independence. It has been a haven in a turbulent region. This is its most valuable, non-mineral asset. South Sudan's story, in stark contrast, is one of continuous conflict, both before and after its own independence.
  • Resource Management: Zambia's economy has been dominated by copper for decades. This has created a "Dutch disease" effect, but it has also allowed for the development of state institutions, cities (the Copperbelt), and infrastructure. South Sudan's oil wealth is newer and has, so far, fueled conflict more than development.
  • Economic Diversification: Recognizing the volatility of copper prices, Zambia has made significant strides in diversifying its economy into agriculture, tourism (Victoria Falls is a world wonder), and services. South Sudan is still almost 100% dependent on oil revenues.
  • Geographic Position: While both are landlocked, Zambia is strategically located in Southern Africa, bordering eight countries and acting as a key transit hub. South Sudan's location in a more volatile region of East/Central Africa presents different, arguably greater, logistical and security challenges.

The Paradox of Stability

Zambia has the "quantity" of stability and a functioning state, which has allowed for a higher "quality" of life and a more predictable environment for its people and for investors. South Sudan, despite its immense oil "quantity," lacks the fundamental "quality" of peace, which prevents any meaningful, broad-based development from taking root.

Practical Advice

If You Want to Start a Business:

  • South Sudan: For specialists in the oil sector and frontier investors in security and logistics. The risks are among the highest in the world.
  • Zambia: A stable and welcoming environment for foreign investment. Major opportunities in commercial agriculture (Zambia has abundant water and fertile land), tourism infrastructure, and mining services. A well-trodden path for international business.

If You Want to Settle Down:

  • South Sudan: A non-starter for almost everyone except those on specific, time-limited, high-risk missions.
  • Zambia: A popular and pleasant destination for expatriates. Lusaka offers a comfortable lifestyle with good schools, social clubs, and a friendly atmosphere. It provides a safe and family-friendly base to experience Southern Africa.

The Tourist Experience

  • South Sudan: A true expedition. Travel here is for adventurers wanting to witness unique cultures in a country rarely seen by outsiders.
  • Zambia: One of Africa's premier tourist destinations. It offers the majestic Victoria Falls ("Mosi-oa-Tunya"), incredible walking safaris in South Luangwa National Park, and a wide range of travel styles, from luxury lodges to rugged camping.

Conclusion: Peace as the Ultimate Currency

The comparison between South Sudan and Zambia is a powerful lesson: natural resource wealth is secondary to peace. Zambia, with its less dramatic but more stable copper industry, has built a far more resilient and prosperous society than South Sudan has managed with its world-class oil reserves. Peace is the ultimate enabler.

🏆 The Verdict

The Bottom Line:

Zambia is the hands-down winner for anyone seeking stability, business opportunity, or a high quality of life. It's a functioning, peaceful nation with a positive future. South Sudan remains a project of national survival.

Final Word:

Zambia shows how to manage being landlocked and resource-rich. South Sudan is a cautionary tale of how it can all go wrong without peace.

💡 Surprising Fact

Zambia earns hundreds of millions of dollars annually from tourism, an industry built entirely on its stability and natural beauty. South Sudan, with equally stunning potential landscapes and cultures, has a tourism industry that is practically non-existent due to insecurity.

Other Country Comparisons

Data Disclaimer: Projected data (future years) are estimates based on mathematical models. Actual values may differ. Learn about our methodology →

Data Sources

Comparison data is aggregated from multiple authoritative international organizations:

World Bank Open Data - Development and economic indicators
UN Data - Population and demographic statistics
IMF Data Portal - International financial statistics
WHO Data - Global health statistics
OECD Statistics - Economic and social data
Our Methodology - Learn how we process and analyze data

Comments (0)

You must log in to comment

Log In