Poverty Rate by Country
Poverty rates vary enormously from one country to the next. In South Sudan, the latest estimate places more than 82% of the population below the national poverty line. In China, the figure stands at zero. Between these extremes lies a wide spectrum: Madagascar at 75%, Honduras at 63%, Nigeria at 56%, and Mexico at 30% on one side, and Malaysia at 5%, Kazakhstan at 5%, and Belarus at 4% on the other. These numbers come from each country's own definition of poverty, not from a single global benchmark. Across the 144 countries with available data between 2015 and 2024, the latest reported poverty rates range from 0% to 82%, with the observation year varying by country.
The World Bank's Poverty and Inequality Platform compiles these figures from official national sources, meaning the data reflects poverty as each country defines it for itself. Some countries update their poverty measurements annually; others conduct surveys once every few years. As a result, the latest available data for some countries comes from 2024, while for others it may be 2021 or even 2015.
What the "poverty rate" actually means in this dataset
The indicator is called the poverty headcount ratio at national poverty lines. In simple terms, it is the percentage of a country's population that lives below the income or consumption threshold that the country itself considers the minimum necessary to meet basic needs. Each country sets its own poverty line, typically based on the cost of a basket of essential goods such as food, clothing, and shelter.
This is not the same as the international poverty line that the World Bank uses for global comparisons across countries. A country with a relatively high national poverty line may report a higher poverty rate than a poorer country with a very low national poverty line, simply because the threshold is set higher. The national poverty line is designed for domestic policy: it tells a government how many of its own citizens fall below what it considers an acceptable standard.
Poverty Rate by Country Table — Latest Available Data (2015–2024)
|
#
|
Country
|
Latest Data (%)
|
Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
South Sudan
SS
|
82.3% | 2016 |
| 2 |
Madagascar
MG
|
75.2% | 2021 |
| 3 |
Central African Republic
CF
|
68.8% | 2021 |
| 4 |
Mozambique
MZ
|
65% | 2022 |
| 5 |
Honduras
HN
|
62.9% | 2024 |
| 6 |
Zambia
ZM
|
60% | 2022 |
| 7 |
Eswatini
SZ
|
58.9% | 2016 |
| 8 |
Sierra Leone
SL
|
56.8% | 2018 |
| 9 |
DR Congo
CD
|
56.2% | 2020 |
| 10 |
Nigeria
NG
|
56.2% | 2022 |
| 11 |
Guatemala
GT
|
56% | 2023 |
| 12 |
Sao Tome and Principe
ST
|
55.5% | 2017 |
| 13 |
Somalia
SO
|
55.4% | 2022 |
| 14 |
Gambia
GM
|
53.4% | 2020 |
| 15 |
Belize
BZ
|
52% | 2018 |
| 16 |
Burundi
BI
|
51% | 2020 |
| 17 |
Liberia
LR
|
50.9% | 2016 |
| 18 |
Equatorial Guinea
GQ
|
50.7% | 2022 |
| 19 |
Malawi
MW
|
50.7% | 2019 |
| 20 |
Guinea-Bissau
GW
|
50.5% | 2021 |
| 21 |
Lesotho
LS
|
49.7% | 2017 |
| 22 |
Afghanistan
AF
|
47.1% | 2019 |
| 23 |
Mali
ML
|
45.5% | 2021 |
| 24 |
Chad
TD
|
44.8% | 2022 |
| 25 |
Togo
TG
|
43.8% | 2021 |
| 26 |
Guinea
GN
|
43.7% | 2018 |
| 27 |
Burkina Faso
BF
|
43.2% | 2021 |
| 28 |
Niger
NE
|
41.2% | 2021 |
| 29 |
Kenya
KE
|
39.8% | 2022 |
| 30 |
Zimbabwe
ZW
|
38.3% | 2019 |
| 31 |
Argentina
AR
|
38.1% | 2024 |
| 32 |
South Africa
ZA
|
37.9% | 2022 |
| 33 |
Bolivia
BO
|
37.7% | 2024 |
| 34 |
Cameroon
CM
|
37.7% | 2021 |
| 35 |
Ivory Coast
CI
|
37.5% | 2021 |
| 36 |
Senegal
SN
|
37.5% | 2021 |
| 37 |
Benin
BJ
|
36.2% | 2021 |
| 38 |
Egypt
EG
|
33.5% | 2021 |
| 39 |
Gabon
GA
|
33.4% | 2017 |
| 40 |
Ethiopia
ET
|
33.1% | 2021 |
| 41 |
Venezuela
VE
|
33.1% | 2015 |
| 42 |
Palestine
PS
|
32.8% | 2023 |
| 43 |
Angola
AO
|
32.3% | 2018 |
| 44 |
Colombia
CO
|
31.8% | 2024 |
| 45 |
Mauritania
MR
|
31.8% | 2019 |
| 46 |
Moldova
MD
|
31.6% | 2023 |
| 47 |
Mexico
MX
|
29.6% | 2024 |
| 48 |
Ecuador
EC
|
28% | 2024 |
| 49 |
Peru
PE
|
27.6% | 2024 |
| 50 |
Rwanda
RW
|
27.4% | 2023 |
| 51 |
El Salvador
SV
|
27.2% | 2023 |
| 52 |
Mongolia
MN
|
27.1% | 2022 |
| 53 |
Tanzania
TZ
|
26.4% | 2018 |
| 54 |
Barbados
BB
|
25.7% | 2016 |
| 55 |
Kyrgyzstan
KG
|
25.7% | 2024 |
| 56 |
Seychelles
SC
|
25.3% | 2018 |
| 57 |
Grenada
GD
|
25% | 2018 |
| 58 |
Saint Lucia
LC
|
25% | 2015 |
| 59 |
Nicaragua
NI
|
24.9% | 2016 |
| 60 |
Cape Verde
CV
|
24.8% | 2023 |
| 61 |
Myanmar
MM
|
24.8% | 2017 |
| 62 |
Fiji
FJ
|
24.1% | 2019 |
| 63 |
Ghana
GH
|
23.4% | 2016 |
| 64 |
Ukraine
UA
|
23.2% | 2020 |
| 65 |
Estonia
EE
|
22.5% | 2022 |
| 66 |
Latvia
LV
|
22.5% | 2022 |
| 67 |
North Macedonia
MK
|
21.9% | 2023 |
| 68 |
Pakistan
PK
|
21.9% | 2018 |
| 69 |
Samoa
WS
|
21.9% | 2018 |
| 70 |
Armenia
AM
|
21.7% | 2024 |
| 71 |
Bulgaria
BG
|
21.7% | 2023 |
| 72 |
Panama
PA
|
21.7% | 2023 |
| 73 |
Djibouti
DJ
|
21.1% | 2017 |
| 74 |
Lithuania
LT
|
20.9% | 2021 |
| 75 |
Tonga
TO
|
20.6% | 2021 |
| 76 |
Costa Rica
CR
|
20.3% | 2024 |
| 77 |
Croatia
HR
|
20.3% | 2024 |
| 78 |
Nepal
NP
|
20.3% | 2022 |
| 79 |
Spain
ES
|
20.2% | 2022 |
| 80 |
Italy
IT
|
20.1% | 2021 |
| 81 |
Paraguay
PY
|
20.1% | 2024 |
| 82 |
Montenegro
ME
|
20% | 2023 |
| 83 |
Tajikistan
TJ
|
19.8% | 2024 |
| 84 |
Albania
AL
|
19.7% | 2022 |
| 85 |
Serbia
RS
|
19.7% | 2023 |
| 86 |
Dominican Republic
DO
|
19% | 2024 |
| 87 |
Romania
RO
|
19% | 2023 |
| 88 |
Greece
GR
|
18.8% | 2021 |
| 89 |
Bangladesh
BD
|
18.7% | 2022 |
| 90 |
United Kingdom
GB
|
18.6% | 2017 |
| 91 |
Kosovo
XK
|
17.6% | 2015 |
| 92 |
Suriname
SR
|
17.6% | 2022 |
| 93 |
Iraq
IQ
|
17.5% | 2023 |
| 94 |
Namibia
NA
|
17.4% | 2015 |
| 95 |
Luxembourg
LU
|
17.3% | 2021 |
| 96 |
Uruguay
UY
|
17.3% | 2024 |
| 97 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina
BA
|
16.9% | 2015 |
| 98 |
Malta
MT
|
16.7% | 2021 |
| 99 |
Tunisia
TN
|
16.6% | 2021 |
| 100 |
Portugal
PT
|
16.4% | 2021 |
| 101 |
Botswana
BW
|
16.1% | 2015 |
| 102 |
Sweden
SE
|
16.1% | 2022 |
| 103 |
Uganda
UG
|
16.1% | 2023 |
| 104 |
Vanuatu
VU
|
15.9% | 2019 |
| 105 |
Switzerland
CH
|
15.8% | 2021 |
| 106 |
Jordan
JO
|
15.7% | 2018 |
| 107 |
France
FR
|
15.6% | 2021 |
| 108 |
Philippines
PH
|
15.5% | 2023 |
| 109 |
Laos
LA
|
15% | 2024 |
| 110 |
Austria
AT
|
14.8% | 2021 |
| 111 |
Germany
DE
|
14.8% | 2021 |
| 112 |
Netherlands
NL
|
14.5% | 2021 |
| 113 |
Sri Lanka
LK
|
14.3% | 2019 |
| 114 |
Ireland
IE
|
14% | 2021 |
| 115 |
Cyprus
CY
|
13.9% | 2021 |
| 116 |
Slovakia
SK
|
13.7% | 2021 |
| 117 |
Poland
PL
|
13.3% | 2024 |
| 118 |
Türkiye
TR
|
13% | 2024 |
| 119 |
Slovenia
SI
|
12.7% | 2022 |
| 120 |
Bhutan
BT
|
12.4% | 2022 |
| 121 |
Denmark
DK
|
12.4% | 2021 |
| 122 |
Belgium
BE
|
12.3% | 2022 |
| 123 |
Finland
FI
|
12.2% | 2022 |
| 124 |
Norway
NO
|
12.2% | 2021 |
| 125 |
Hungary
HU
|
12.1% | 2021 |
| 126 |
Czech Republic
CZ
|
10.2% | 2021 |
| 127 |
Georgia
GE
|
9.4% | 2024 |
| 128 |
Indonesia
ID
|
9% | 2024 |
| 129 |
Uzbekistan
UZ
|
8.9% | 2024 |
| 130 |
Iceland
IS
|
8.8% | 2017 |
| 131 |
Mauritius
MU
|
8.4% | 2023 |
| 132 |
Jamaica
JM
|
8.2% | 2023 |
| 133 |
Marshall Islands
MH
|
7.2% | 2019 |
| 134 |
Russia
RU
|
7.2% | 2024 |
| 135 |
Chile
CL
|
6.5% | 2022 |
| 136 |
Kiribati
KI
|
5.5% | 2023 |
| 137 |
Maldives
MV
|
5.4% | 2019 |
| 138 |
Thailand
TH
|
5.4% | 2022 |
| 139 |
Malaysia
MY
|
5.1% | 2023 |
| 140 |
Kazakhstan
KZ
|
5% | 2024 |
| 141 |
Vietnam
VN
|
4.2% | 2022 |
| 142 |
Morocco
MA
|
3.9% | 2022 |
| 143 |
Belarus
BY
|
3.5% | 2024 |
| 144 |
China
CN
|
0% | 2020 |
Where poverty rates are highest and lowest
Among countries with available data, the highest poverty rates are concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Latin America. South Sudan (82.3%, 2016) tops the list, followed by Madagascar (75.2%, 2021), the Central African Republic (68.8%, 2021), and Mozambique (65.0%, 2022). Honduras reports the highest rate in the Americas at 62.9% (2024). Zambia (60.0%, 2022), Sierra Leone (56.8%, 2018), the Democratic Republic of Congo (56.2%, 2020), and Nigeria (56.2%, 2022) complete the upper end of the scale — all reporting that more than half of their populations live below the national poverty line.
At the other end, the lowest reported poverty rates come from a mix of upper-middle-income and high-income countries. China reports 0.0% (2020), the lowest in the dataset, reflecting the fact that its national poverty line had been met for the entire population by that year. Morocco (3.9%, 2022), Belarus (3.5%, 2024), Kazakhstan (5.0%, 2024), Malaysia (5.1%, 2023), Thailand (5.4%, 2022), and Russia (7.2%, 2024) all report rates below 10%. Iceland (8.8%, 2017), Georgia (9.4%, 2024), and Indonesia (9.0%, 2024) also fall in the single-digit range.
It is important to note that the observation year differs across countries. For example, China's data is from 2020, South Sudan's from 2016, and Iceland's from 2017. The poverty rate in these countries may have changed since their last reported measurement.
Regional patterns across the dataset
Sub-Saharan African countries make up a significant share of the highest poverty rates in the dataset. Madagascar, the Central African Republic, Mozambique, Zambia, Sierra Leone, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria, and Somalia all record rates above 50%. Several Latin American countries also report relatively high figures: Honduras (62.9%), Guatemala (56.0%), and Bolivia (37.7%) are among the notable examples.
Countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia tend to report lower poverty rates under their national definitions. Belarus (3.5%), Kazakhstan (5.0%), Russia (7.2%), and Georgia (9.4%) all fall in the single digits. Many European Union member states in the dataset report rates between 10% and 25%, reflecting national poverty lines that are set at relatively higher income thresholds.
These patterns should be read with caution. A lower poverty rate in one country does not necessarily mean its population is better off than in a country with a higher rate — it may simply mean the poverty line is set lower. Regional comparisons within the dataset are most meaningful when grouped by countries with similar income levels and similar approaches to defining poverty.
Countries where poverty rates have changed notably
Several countries in the dataset show clear trends over the 2015–2024 period. The Dominican Republic recorded one of the largest declines, falling from 34.8% in 2016 to 19.0% in 2024. Mexico's poverty rate dropped from 43.2% in 2016 to 29.6% in 2024. Jamaica saw a decline from 21.2% in 2015 to 8.2% by 2023. Georgia's rate fell from 21.6% (2015) to 9.4% (2024). Armenia declined from 29.8% (2015) to 21.7% (2024), and the Philippines from 23.5% (2015) to 15.5% (2023).
Russia's poverty rate shows a steady downward trend from 13.5% in 2015 to 7.2% in 2024. Romania declined from 25.3% (2015) to 19.0% (2023), and Serbia from 25.9% (2015) to 19.7% (2023). Ukraine recorded a sharp drop from 51.9% in 2015 to 23.2% in 2020, although data after 2020 is not available in this dataset.
Not all movements were downward. Argentina's poverty rate increased from 30.3% in 2016 to 38.1% in 2024, with notable year-to-year volatility. Peru also saw a rise from 21.8% (2015) to 27.6% (2024), and Moldova increased from 25.2% (2019) to 31.6% (2023).
These trends reflect changes observable in the data itself. The dataset does not explain why these changes occurred, but it provides a consistent record of how the measured poverty rate has evolved within each country's own national framework.
How to interpret the data correctly
The most important thing to understand about national poverty lines is that they are not standardized across countries. A person classified as poor in Norway would almost certainly not be considered poor in Madagascar, because Norway's poverty line is set at a much higher income level. This means that comparing poverty rates between countries can be misleading if the comparison is treated as a like-for-like measure of material deprivation.
National poverty rates are most useful for understanding poverty trends within a single country over time. When a country's statistical office measures poverty using the same methodology across multiple years, the resulting trend shows whether the share of people below the national minimum is rising or falling. That is valuable information for policymakers and for anyone tracking social progress.
The dataset also highlights which countries conduct regular poverty surveys and which do not. Countries that report data annually or near-annually, such as Turkey and Russia, provide a continuous picture of poverty trends. Others report data only sporadically, leaving gaps that make trend analysis difficult.
Data Notes
The data is sourced from the World Bank's Poverty and Inequality Platform (PIP). The indicator is the poverty headcount ratio at national poverty lines, expressed as a percentage of the total population. It covers the period from 2015 to 2024 and includes 144 countries with at least one observation within this window. The data is compiled from official government sources or computed by World Bank staff using each country's own national poverty line.
Because countries conduct poverty surveys on different schedules, not every country has data for every year. For the country-level overview presented in this article, the latest available observation within 2015–2024 is used for each country. The specific year of the latest observation varies: 24 countries have 2024 data, 19 have 2023 data, 25 have 2022 data, and the remainder have data from earlier years within the range.
Users who need strictly comparable cross-country poverty data should consult the World Bank's international poverty line indicators, which apply a uniform threshold across countries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the poverty rate?
The poverty rate (or poverty headcount ratio) is the percentage of a country's population living below a defined poverty line. In this dataset, the poverty line is set by each country according to its own national standards.
What does the national poverty line mean?
A national poverty line is the minimum level of income or consumption that a country considers adequate to meet basic needs. It is typically calculated based on the cost of a basket of essential goods and services such as food, housing, clothing, and healthcare. Each country defines this threshold independently.
Why don't all countries have data for 2024?
Poverty data comes from household surveys, which are costly and logistically complex. Many countries conduct these surveys every two to five years rather than annually. The most recent available data point for a given country may therefore be from an earlier year within the 2015–2024 period.
Can poverty rates be directly compared between countries?
No, not directly. Because each country sets its own poverty line, a direct comparison between two countries' national poverty rates does not tell you which country has more material deprivation. The thresholds differ in terms of income level, the goods included in the basket, and the methodology used. For cross-country comparisons, the World Bank's international poverty line is more appropriate.
What is the difference between national and international poverty lines?
A national poverty line is set by a country's own government to reflect its local economic conditions, cost of living, and social standards. The international poverty line is a fixed monetary threshold used by the World Bank to estimate extreme poverty consistently across all countries, based on a uniform global standard. National poverty rates are generally higher than international extreme poverty rates in middle-income countries, because the national line is set at a higher level.
Why does the poverty rate change from year to year?
Year-to-year changes can result from economic growth or contraction, changes in income distribution, changes in the cost of living, revisions to the poverty line itself, or improvements in survey methodology. When the poverty line remains constant, a declining poverty rate typically indicates that incomes are rising faster than the cost of basic needs. An increasing rate may indicate economic stress, rising inequality, or an upward revision to the poverty line.
Data Disclaimer: Projected data (future years) are estimates based on mathematical models. Actual values may differ. Learn about our methodology →
Sources
-
Updated: 28.07.2026https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.NAHC
Please log in to leave a comment.
Log in
(0) Comments