Climate Change Education in Schools by Country

Climate change education in schools measures how well countries integrate climate change topics into their education systems. This indicator reflects curriculum integration, teacher training, and institutional practices specifically focused on climate change causes, impacts, and solutions.

Understanding Climate Change Education Integration

Climate change education in schools is measured through a UNESCO indicator that assesses the extent to which countries integrate climate change topics into their national education systems. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating stronger integration of climate change causes, impacts, adaptation, and mitigation into curricula, teacher training, and education policies. This indicator is more specific than general environmental education, focusing specifically on climate change as a distinct educational priority.

This indicator captures curriculum content addressing climate science, greenhouse gas emissions, climate impacts, adaptation strategies, and mitigation solutions. It also reflects teacher training in climate change topics, policy frameworks mandating climate education, and student engagement in climate action projects. Unlike general environmental education, this measure focuses specifically on whether education systems prepare students to understand and respond to the climate crisis.

The global landscape shows significant variation among the 95 countries with measurable climate change education integration. South Sudan (73.9%) leads unexpectedly, followed by Guyana (58.5%), Marshall Islands (59.3%), and Mauritius (54.0%). Many developed countries show moderate scores: Australia (32.6%), Canada (32.6%), China (34.9%), and France (34.7%). Notably, 20 countries including Brazil, Indonesia, Poland, South Africa, and Thailand show nil or negligible climate change education integration and are excluded from this analysis, indicating that climate change is not always prioritized as a distinct educational topic even in countries with strong general environmental education programs.

Climate Change Education in Schools by Country

Export

Excel (.xlsx) CSV Document PDF Document PNG Image

#	Country	2023 Score
1	South Sudan SS	73.9
2	Marshall Islands MH	59.3
3	Guyana GY	58.5
4	Mauritius MU	54
5	Bhutan BT	53.8
6	Uganda UG	50.2
7	Vietnam VN	49.5
8	Cameroon CM	49.2
9	Liberia LR	49
10	Türkiye TR	48.6
11	Italy IT	48.4
12	Saint Kitts and Nevis KN	47.6
13	Ghana GH	45.9
14	Bolivia BO	45.3
15	Rwanda RW	44.9
16	Cook Islands CK	44.4
17	Belize BZ	44.1
18	Singapore SG	43.9
19	Bahamas BS	43.4
20	Costa Rica CR	43.4
21	Tanzania TZ	43.2
22	Uruguay UY	42.8
23	Ecuador EC	42.6
24	Panama PA	42.1
25	Denmark DK	40.6
26	Spain ES	40.5
27	Pakistan PK	37.2
28	DR Congo CD	36.9
29	Kyrgyzstan KG	36.5
30	Hungary HU	35.2
31	China CN	34.9
32	France FR	34.7
33	Greece GR	34.5
34	Australia AU	32.6
35	Canada CA	32.6
36	Kenya KE	31.7
37	United Arab Emirates AE	31.7
38	Peru PE	30.2
39	Myanmar MM	29.3
40	Gambia GM	28.3
41	United Kingdom GB	27.9
42	Jamaica JM	27.8
43	Norway NO	27.2
44	Slovenia SI	27.2
45	Kuwait KW	26.2
46	South Korea KR	25.7
47	Burkina Faso BF	25.5
48	Nigeria NG	25.4
49	Sierra Leone SL	25.2
50	Chile CL	24.6
51	Ireland IE	23.6
52	Estonia EE	22.9
53	Dominican Republic DO	21.9
54	Qatar QA	21.8
55	Cape Verde CV	21
56	Cyprus CY	20.8
57	Maldives MV	20.8
58	Portugal PT	19.7
59	Mexico MX	19.2
60	Papua New Guinea PG	19.1
61	Lesotho LS	18.6
62	Sri Lanka LK	18.5
63	Saint Vincent and the Grenadines VC	17.9
64	Sweden SE	17
65	Paraguay PY	16.3
66	Venezuela VE	16.3
67	Mongolia MN	16
68	Dominica DM	15.2
69	Japan JP	15.2
70	Zimbabwe ZW	15.2
71	New Zealand NZ	14.5
72	Samoa WS	13.5
73	Zambia ZM	13.4
74	Bulgaria BG	13.3
75	Argentina AR	13.2
76	Liechtenstein LI	12.8
77	Malta MT	12.2
78	India IN	11.8
79	Cuba CU	11.7
80	Finland FI	11.7
81	Oman OM	10.7
82	Philippines PH	10.4
83	Georgia GE	9.5
84	Slovakia SK	9
85	Botswana BW	6.4
86	Armenia AM	3.3
87	Lithuania LT	2.5
88	Romania RO	2.5

Regional Patterns in Climate Change Education

Small island developing states (SIDS) demonstrate exceptionally strong climate change education integration. Marshall Islands (59.3%), Guyana (58.5%), Mauritius (54.0%), Bhutan (53.8%), and Saint Kitts and Nevis (47.6%) lead globally. These countries face existential threats from sea level rise, extreme weather, and climate impacts, driving urgent prioritization of climate education. Their high scores reflect national recognition that climate literacy is essential for survival and adaptation.

African countries show highly varied performance. South Sudan (73.9%) achieves the world's highest score, while Cameroon (49.2%), Uganda (50.2%), Ghana (45.9%), and Rwanda (44.9%) show strong integration. However, many African countries report nil or negligible climate education and are excluded from this analysis: South Africa, Senegal, Morocco, Madagascar, and Ivory Coast. This variation reflects different national priorities, capacities, and awareness of climate vulnerability despite the continent facing severe climate impacts.

Latin American and Caribbean countries demonstrate moderate to strong performance among those with measurable integration. Bolivia (45.3%), Belize (44.1%), Costa Rica (43.4%), Ecuador (42.6%), and Panama (42.1%) lead the region. These countries face diverse climate threats including deforestation, extreme weather, and ecosystem degradation, driving climate education prioritization. However, some major countries show nil integration and are excluded: Brazil and Colombia both report negligible climate change education despite their Amazon rainforest stakes and climate vulnerability.

European countries show surprisingly moderate climate education integration despite strong climate policies. Denmark (40.6%) and Spain (40.5%) lead Europe, followed by Greece (34.5%) and Hungary (35.2%). However, many European countries score low: Finland (11.7%), Lithuania (2.5%), Romania (2.5%), while Latvia and Poland report nil integration and are excluded. This suggests that while Europe leads in climate policy, systematic climate education integration lags behind, possibly because climate topics are integrated informally rather than through explicit curriculum mandates.

Asian countries display wide variation. China (34.9%) leads major Asian economies, while Pakistan (37.2%), Kyrgyzstan (36.5%), and Vietnam (49.5%) show strong integration. However, major countries report nil integration and are excluded: Indonesia, Kazakhstan, and Thailand despite climate vulnerability. Japan (15.2%), South Korea (25.7%), and India (11.8%) show modest integration. This variation suggests different national approaches to climate education across the diverse region.

Factors Influencing Climate Change Education Integration

Climate vulnerability and immediacy of threats strongly influence climate education prioritization. Small island states facing sea level rise, countries experiencing severe droughts or floods, and nations with threatened ecosystems prioritize climate education more urgently. South Sudan, despite development challenges, achieves the highest score, likely reflecting climate-driven conflicts and displacement. Marshall Islands and other Pacific islands face existential threats, driving comprehensive climate education.

National climate policy frameworks affect education integration. Countries with strong national climate commitments, nationally determined contributions (NDCs), and climate action plans are more likely to integrate climate education systematically. However, the relationship is not automatic—some countries with strong climate policies show weak climate education integration, suggesting policy-education gaps.

Political and economic factors shape climate education. Countries where climate change is politically contentious or economically threatening may resist systematic climate education despite vulnerability. Some oil-producing nations show low scores, though others like UAE (31.7%) demonstrate that fossil fuel economies can still prioritize climate education. Political leadership and public awareness determine whether climate education becomes a national priority.

Curriculum space and competing priorities affect integration. Education systems face numerous demands, and adding explicit climate change content requires difficult choices. Some countries may address climate informally through science or geography rather than as a distinct curriculum priority, resulting in lower scores on this indicator despite actual climate content. The indicator measures explicit, systematic integration rather than informal coverage.

Implications of Climate Change Education

Climate literacy and understanding represent the most direct outcomes. Students exposed to climate change education develop better understanding of climate science, greenhouse gas emissions, climate impacts, and the urgency of action. This knowledge foundation enables informed decision-making about climate-related choices throughout life. Countries with strong climate education are building populations better equipped to understand and respond to the climate crisis.

Behavioral change and climate action emerge from effective climate education. Students learning about climate change are more likely to adopt low-carbon behaviors, support climate policies, and engage in climate action. Youth climate movements globally demonstrate that climate-educated young people become advocates for stronger climate action, pressuring governments and institutions to respond more urgently to the climate crisis.

Climate adaptation and resilience improve through education. Countries facing climate impacts need populations that understand adaptation strategies, disaster preparedness, and resilient livelihoods. Climate education builds capacity for community-level adaptation, particularly crucial for vulnerable countries where climate impacts threaten development and survival. Education empowers communities to implement local adaptation solutions.

Economic opportunities in climate sectors benefit from climate education. As economies transition toward decarbonization, demand grows for workers with climate knowledge and skills. Countries investing in climate education are preparing workforces for jobs in renewable energy, climate adaptation, sustainable agriculture, and green technologies. This creates competitive advantage in emerging climate-related industries.

Challenges in Climate Change Education Integration

Political resistance and climate denial present major obstacles. In contexts where climate science is contested or climate action is politically divisive, systematic climate education faces opposition. Some countries avoid explicit climate education to prevent political controversy, instead addressing climate informally or minimally. Overcoming this resistance requires political leadership and broad stakeholder engagement.

Curriculum overcrowding limits climate education space. Education systems already struggle to cover numerous topics, and adding explicit climate change content requires difficult prioritization decisions. Some countries address this through integration across subjects, but this approach may not register as systematic climate education in indicators measuring explicit curriculum mandates.

Teacher capacity and training gaps limit implementation quality. Many teachers lack training in climate science, climate impacts, and climate pedagogy. Climate change is a rapidly evolving field, requiring ongoing teacher professional development. Additionally, climate education requires interdisciplinary approaches and engagement with complex, sometimes distressing topics, challenging traditional teaching approaches.

Resource constraints affect climate education, particularly in vulnerable countries. Developing climate curricula, creating teaching materials, training teachers, and implementing climate education programs all require resources. Countries facing immediate climate impacts often have limited resources for education system development, creating a cruel paradox where most vulnerable countries struggle most to implement climate education.

Strategies for Strengthening Climate Change Education

Explicit policy frameworks and curriculum mandates provide essential foundations. Countries seeking to strengthen climate education should develop clear policies requiring climate change topics throughout education systems. These policies should specify learning objectives, curriculum requirements, and implementation expectations. Explicit mandates ensure systematic rather than voluntary climate education and create accountability for implementation.

Teacher professional development must be prioritized. Investing in both pre-service teacher education and in-service professional development ensures teachers have climate knowledge, pedagogical skills, and confidence to deliver climate education effectively. This includes climate science content, teaching approaches for complex topics, and resources for classroom implementation. Ongoing professional development is essential as climate science and impacts evolve.

Integration across subjects offers an effective approach. Rather than creating separate climate courses, integrating climate topics across science, social studies, mathematics, and other subjects ensures broader coverage and reinforces climate concepts through multiple contexts. This approach also reflects the interdisciplinary nature of climate change and its impacts across all aspects of society.

Youth engagement and climate action projects strengthen learning. Climate education is most effective when students engage in real climate action—school energy audits, community adaptation projects, climate advocacy, and sustainable practices. Action-oriented climate education builds agency and empowers students to contribute to climate solutions rather than feeling helpless about the crisis.

International cooperation and resource sharing can support climate education in vulnerable countries. Countries with strong climate education programs can share curricula, teaching materials, and expertise with countries seeking to strengthen climate education. International organizations and climate funds can support climate education development in countries facing resource constraints but urgent climate education needs.