Madagascar vs Sweden Comparison

Country Comparison
Madagascar Flag

Madagascar

32.7M (2025)

VS
Sweden Flag

Sweden

10.7M (2025)

Comprehensive comparison across 9 categories and 44 indicators

Loading countries...

No countries found

Loading countries...

No countries found
Madagascar Flag

Madagascar

Population: 32.7M (2025) Area: 587K km² GDP: $18.7B (2025)
Capital: Antananarivo
Continent: Africa
Official Languages: Malagasy, French
Currency: MGA
HDI: 0.487 (183.)
Sweden Flag

Sweden

Population: 10.7M (2025) Area: 450.3K km² GDP: $620.3B (2025)
Capital: Stockholm
Continent: Europe
Official Languages: Swedish
Currency: SEK
HDI: 0.959 (5.)

Geography and Demographics

Madagascar
Sweden
Area
587K km²
450.3K km²
Total population
32.7M (2025)
10.7M (2025)
Population density
53.6 people/km² (2025)
26.4 people/km² (2025)
Average age
19.2 (2025)
40.3 (2025)

Economy and Finance

Madagascar
Sweden
Total GDP
$18.7B (2025)
$620.3B (2025)
GDP per capita
$595 (2025)
$58,100 (2025)
Inflation rate
8.4% (2025)
2.1% (2025)
Growth rate
3.9% (2025)
1.9% (2025)
Minimum wage
$55 (2024)
No data
Tourism revenue
$200M (2025)
$17B (2025)
Unemployment rate
2.9% (2025)
8.5% (2025)
Public debt
37.1% (2025)
34.7% (2025)
Trade balance
-$245 (2025)
$629 (2025)

Quality of Life and Health

Madagascar
Sweden
Human development
0.487 (183.)
0.959 (5.)
Happiness index
4,157 (130.)
7,345 (4.)
Health Exp. per Cap. ($)
$16 (3%)
$6.2K (10.9%)
Life expectancy
64 (2025)
83.6 (2025)
Safety index
54.1 (139.)
90.5 (14.)

Education and Technology

Madagascar
Sweden
Education Exp. (% GDP)
2.9% (2025)
7.6% (2025)
Literacy rate
76.1% (2025)
No data
Primary school completion
76.1% (2025)
No data
Internet usage
24.3% (2025)
96.7% (2025)
Internet speed
31.31 Mbps (124.)
186.86 Mbps (28.)

Environment and Sustainability

Madagascar
Sweden
Renewable energy
29.2% (2025)
80.3% (2025)
Carbon emissions per capita
4 kg per capita (2025)
35 kg per capita (2025)
Forest area
21.3% (2025)
68.7% (2025)
Freshwater resources
337 kmÂł (2025)
174 kmÂł (2025)
Air quality
12.38 µg/m³ PM2.5 (2025)
5.06 µg/m³ PM2.5 (2025)

Military Power

Madagascar
Sweden
Military expenditure
$131.3M (2025)
$15.6B (2025)
Military power rank
673 (126.)
22,869 (32.)

Governance and Politics

Madagascar
Sweden
Democracy index
5.33 (2024)
9.39 (2024)
Corruption perception
26 (144.)
81 (8.)
Political stability
-0.7 (136.)
0.8 (56.)
Press freedom
55 (78.)
88 (5.)

Infrastructure and Services

Madagascar
Sweden
Clean water access
53.4% (2025)
100.0% (2025)
Electricity access
41.6% (2025)
100.0% (2025)
Electricity price
0.13 $/kWh (2025)
0.17 $/kWh (2025)
Paved Roads
No data
71 % (2025)
Traffic deaths (per 100K)
30.7 /100K (2025)
2.87 /100K (2025)
Retirement age
60 (2025)
No data

Tourism and International Relations

Madagascar
Sweden
Passport power
40.7 (2025)
91.19 (2025)
Tourist arrivals
87.1K (2020)
6.6M (2022)
Tourism revenue
$200M (2025)
$17B (2025)
World heritage sites
3 (2025)
15 (2025)

Comparison Result

Madagascar
Madagascar Flag
8.0

Superior Fields

Leader
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden Flag
31.0

Superior Fields

* This score reflects overall livability and quality of life, not just economic or military strength

GDP Comparison

Total GDP

$18.7B (2025)
Madagascar
vs
$620.3B (2025)
Sweden
Difference: %3215

GDP per Capita

$595 (2025)
Madagascar
vs
$58,100 (2025)
Sweden
Difference: %9665

Comparison Evaluation

Madagascar Flag

Madagascar Evaluation

While Madagascar ranks lower overall compared to Sweden, specific areas demonstrate competitive advantages:

Strong points for Madagascar: • Madagascar has 3.1x higher population • Madagascar has 2.9x higher birth rate • Madagascar has 2.0x higher population density • Madagascar has 30% higher land area
Sweden Flag

Sweden Evaluation

Sweden excels with: • Sweden has 97.6x higher GDP per capita • Sweden has 33.2x higher GDP • Sweden has 384.5x higher healthcare spending per capita • Sweden has 3.1x higher corruption perception index

Overall Evaluation

Final Conclusion

Sweden vs. Madagascar: The Rational Planner vs. The Evolutionary Oddity

A Tale of a Blueprint and a Lost World

Comparing Sweden and Madagascar is like contrasting a state-of-the-art laboratory with a sealed-off, forgotten continent. Sweden is a triumph of rational thought, a society meticulously designed for efficiency, equality, and progress. Madagascar, the world’s fourth-largest island, is a biological and cultural marvel, a "lost world" that split from Africa and India tens of millions of years ago, allowing its flora and fauna to evolve in splendid isolation. One is a human-made wonder; the other is a natural one.

The Most Striking Contrasts

Origin and Identity: Sweden is a quintessentially European nation, forged in the crucible of regional history. Madagascar is a unique blend of Southeast Asian (its first settlers arrived by outrigger canoe from Borneo) and East African influences, creating a Malagasy culture and language unlike any other.

Biodiversity: Sweden has a beautiful but typical Northern European ecology. Madagascar is one of the world's most critical biodiversity hotspots. Around 90% of its wildlife is found nowhere else on Earth, from its famous lemurs to bizarre chameleons and the otherworldly Avenue of the Baobabs.Infrastructure: Sweden is a web of smooth roads, high-speed trains, and fiber-optic cables. Madagascar is a challenge to traverse. Its large size and rugged terrain mean infrastructure is limited, and travel is often a slow, arduous, but rewarding adventure.

The Quality vs. Quantity Paradox

Sweden provides an exceptional quality of life for its people, with world-class services and safety. It’s a society designed for human comfort. Madagascar’s paradox is its incredible natural wealth coexisting with widespread poverty. The "quality" it possesses is biological and irreplaceable. To see a ring-tailed lemur in the wild is to witness a unique evolutionary story. The challenge is protecting this natural treasure while improving the lives of its people, who are among the poorest in the world.

Practical Advice

If You Want to Start a Business:

  • In Sweden: A stable, transparent, and innovative environment perfect for a global business.
  • In Madagascar: Niche opportunities in high-end eco-tourism, sustainable agriculture (it’s a major vanilla producer), and conservation-related enterprises. It requires immense patience and a commitment to ethical practices.

If You Want to Settle Down:

  • Sweden is for you if: You seek a safe, modern, and predictable life for your family.
  • Madagascar is for you if: You are a conservation biologist, a tropical disease doctor, a development worker, or someone seeking a life completely removed from the modern rat race, with a deep appreciation for its unique culture and nature.

The Tourist Experience

Sweden: A stylish and serene journey through beautiful cities and gentle, accessible nature. It’s comfortable and chic.Madagascar: The ultimate naturalist’s pilgrimage. Explore its diverse national parks, from the rainforests of the east to the spiny deserts of the south, in search of unique wildlife. It is a challenging, often basic, but profoundly unforgettable adventure.

Conclusion: Which World Do You Choose?

To choose Sweden is to choose a world of human ingenuity, a society that has been rationally designed for maximum well-being and progress. It is a choice for order and comfort. To choose Madagascar is to choose a world of natural wonder, a living museum of evolution that tells a story millions of years old. It is a choice for wildness and discovery.🏆 The Final Verdict: For human quality of life, there is no contest: Sweden is the victor. For biological uniqueness and the sheer wonder of the natural world, Madagascar is one of the most precious places on the planet.

Practical Decision: Live in the well-ordered world of Sweden. Save up for a once-in-a-lifetime journey to Madagascar to witness a world that evolved on its own terms.The Final Word: Sweden is a perfectly engineered society. Madagascar is a beautifully flawed, one-of-a-kind evolutionary experiment.

đź’ˇ Surprise Fact: Sweden is a global leader in recycling and waste management, a model of a circular economy. Madagascar faces a severe deforestation crisis, largely due to slash-and-burn agriculture, which threatens its unique habitats. One nation is tidying its house; the other is at risk of losing its very foundations.

Other Country Comparisons

Data Disclaimer: Projected data (future years) are estimates based on mathematical models. Actual values may differ. Learn about our methodology →

Data Sources

Comparison data is aggregated from multiple authoritative international organizations:

World Bank Open Data - Development and economic indicators
UN Data - Population and demographic statistics
IMF Data Portal - International financial statistics
WHO Data - Global health statistics
OECD Statistics - Economic and social data
Our Methodology - Learn how we process and analyze data

Comments (0)

You must log in to comment

Log In