Computer Access in Primary Schools by Country (2026)
Computer access in primary schools is fundamental to developing digital literacy skills and preparing students for success in an increasingly technology-driven world. Primary schools (ISCED Level 1, typically ages 6-11) require computers for teaching basic digital skills, supporting diverse learning styles, and enabling access to educational resources. This indicator tracks the proportion of primary schools with access to computers for pedagogical purposes, a key component of SDG Indicator 4.a.1 monitored by the UNESCO Institute for Statistics. This comprehensive analysis examines computer access in primary schools across 180+ countries, providing 2026 projections grounded in country-specific assessments and historical development patterns from 2000 to 2025.
Computer access in primary schools demonstrates significant global variation, with developed nations achieving near-universal availability while many developing countries face substantial infrastructure gaps. As of 2026, approximately 35% of countries have achieved or will maintain 80%+ computer access in their primary schools, while roughly 40% of countries face coverage below 40%. Primary schools typically have lower computer access rates than secondary schools in most countries, reflecting infrastructure investment priorities and the greater complexity of deploying technology at the primary level. The highest-performing regions include Europe, North America, East Asia, and the Gulf states, where computer access in primary schools has reached near-universal or universal levels. Countries like Denmark, Sweden, South Korea, and the United Arab Emirates have maintained 95%+ availability for extended periods. Meanwhile, rapidly developing nations such as India, Vietnam, and Rwanda demonstrate remarkable progress in extending computer infrastructure to primary schools, though significant urban-rural divides persist. Sub-Saharan Africa presents the most pronounced challenges for primary school computer access, with countries experiencing severe infrastructure deficits due to limited electricity, high equipment costs, and competing priorities for limited education budgets. However, some countries have made significant progress through targeted digital education initiatives and infrastructure investments. South Asia shows mixed patterns reflecting diverse development trajectories. Countries in this region are gradually expanding computer access to primary schools as device costs decline and governments prioritize digital education infrastructure. The region's large youth population and growing emphasis on STEM education are driving increased investment in school technology. Latin America demonstrates relatively strong computer access in primary schools compared to many developing regions, with many countries achieving 60%+ coverage. These achievements reflect decades of education infrastructure investment and stronger government commitment to digital education at the primary level. This analysis presents 2026 computer access projections for primary schools across 180+ countries through comprehensive individual country assessment of historical data, development trajectories, and contextual factors. The methodology emphasizes transparency, accountability to source data, and realistic projections rooted in country-specific circumstances. Data Source and Measurement: The analysis utilizes UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) data on the proportion of primary schools with access to computers for pedagogical purposes, spanning the period 2000-2025 (Indicator SCHBSP.1.WCOMPUT, component of SDG Indicator 4.a.1). This indicator measures the proportion of primary schools (ISCED Level 1, typically ages 6-11) with access to computers for teaching and learning purposes. The dataset encompasses 180+ countries with varying data availability, with data recency ranging from 2023-2025 for many countries to older data from 2000-2022 for others. Individual Country Assessment: Rather than applying automated projection methods, this analysis employed dedicated manual assessment for all countries. Each country received individualized analysis considering its unique historical pattern, baseline value, regional context, income level, infrastructure development trajectory, and technology adoption trends. This approach ensures projections reflect real-world constraints and opportunities rather than applying uniform growth assumptions across diverse contexts. Baseline Value Respect: All projections respect the most recent available data as the baseline, with changes typically limited to ±3-5 percentage points from the latest value. This conservative approach acknowledges that computer infrastructure in schools evolves gradually and that dramatic shifts require extraordinary circumstances or major policy initiatives. Saturation Effects: Countries with computer access above 85% receive minimal growth projections, typically +0.5 to +2 percentage points, recognizing that reaching the final 10-15% of schools involves the most remote, costly installations. Conversely, countries in the 30-70% range often show larger absolute gains as mid-range expansion is typically more cost-effective than final-mile coverage. Technology Adoption Trends: Projections incorporated sector-specific technology developments: declining computer costs, mobile device adoption, government digital education initiatives, and COVID-19 pandemic impacts on school digitalization. Countries that accelerated computer deployment during 2020-2023 were assessed for sustainability of these gains versus potential reversals if funding priorities shift. Regional Benchmarking: Countries were evaluated within their regional contexts to ensure projections align with comparable nations. This approach prevents unrealistic outliers while respecting individual country circumstances. Methodology Changes and Data Anomalies: The UNESCO Institute for Statistics dataset contains several countries with significant unexplained data fluctuations that suggest potential methodology changes, data collection issues, or reporting inconsistencies. These anomalies do not reflect realistic changes in school computer access but rather appear to be artifacts of the data collection or reporting process. Notable examples include: Albania experienced a sharp decline from 83.0% (2021) to 15.4% (2023), suggesting a methodology change in how computer access was measured or reported. Tuvalu showed a dramatic drop from 100.0% (2022) to 10.0% (2023), an implausible change that likely reflects a data collection or definition change rather than actual infrastructure loss. Marshall Islands declined from 92.6% (2020) to 26.1% (2021), and Nauru fell from 100.0% (2020) to 0.0% (2022), both indicating potential measurement inconsistencies. South Africa reported 100.0% (2019) before dropping to 10.1% (2021), and Zambia declined from 85.4% (2017) to 29.5% (2024), suggesting evolving data collection standards. Despite these data quality concerns, this analysis uses the most recent available data as the baseline for projections, as required by transparency and accountability principles. The 2026 projections for affected countries are therefore conservative, respecting the latest reported values while acknowledging that these values may not accurately reflect actual school computer access. Users should interpret projections for countries with significant data anomalies with appropriate caution, recognizing that actual infrastructure levels may differ from reported figures.Global Computer Availability in Primary Schools
Computer Access in Primary Schools by Country (2026)
Regional Disparities and Infrastructure Challenges
Computer Access in Primary Schools by Country (2026)
#
1
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
2
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
3
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
4
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
5
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
6
94.9%
96.5%
97.8%
98.4%
98.9%
99.7%
100%
7
100%
100%
100%
100%
-
-
100%
8
100%
100%
56.8%
100%
100%
100%
100%
9
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
100%
11
99.4%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
12
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
13
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
14
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
15
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
-
100%
16
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
17
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
18
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
19
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
20
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
21
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
22
99.4%
99.5%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
23
27.1%
-
-
100%
100%
-
100%
24
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
25
88%
92%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
26
86.4%
-
-
-
100%
-
100%
27
70.1%
100%
100%
-
100%
100%
100%
28
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
29
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
30
100%
100%
100%
-
100%
-
100%
31
98.8%
100%
-
100%
100%
-
100%
32
100%
-
100%
-
-
-
100%
33
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
34
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
35
100%
99.3%
99.8%
100%
100%
100%
100%
36
73%
-
-
-
100%
100%
100%
37
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
38
79.3%
84.4%
86.2%
88.2%
90.3%
100%
100%
39
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
40
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
41
89.2%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
42
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
43
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
44
-
84.2%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
45
-
-
-
-
49.7%
100%
100%
46
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
47
-
-
-
-
100%
-
100%
48
100%
100%
100%
100%
99.2%
100%
100%
49
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
-
100%
50
99.6%
-
-
-
-
-
100%
51
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
52
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
53
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
54
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
55
-
-
-
-
-
-
100%
56
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
57
-
-
96.6%
100%
100%
100%
100%
58
99.8%
99.8%
99.9%
99.9%
99.9%
99.9%
100%
59
100%
100%
100%
-
100%
100%
100%
60
-
-
-
-
-
100%
100%
61
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
62
100%
99.9%
100%
100%
100%
-
100%
63
100%
-
-
-
99.6%
-
100%
64
96.2%
96%
97.5%
97.8%
97.7%
98.1%
100%
65
-
-
-
100%
100%
100%
100%
66
100%
100%
100%
65.6%
100%
100%
100%
67
99%
-
-
-
-
-
99.5%
68
98.1%
98.5%
98.7%
98.8%
99%
99.3%
99.4%
69
99.2%
97.6%
99.4%
99.1%
98.6%
98.6%
99.1%
70
83.4%
-
75%
57.2%
57.9%
97.9%
98.4%
71
-
-
-
-
-
97.6%
98.1%
72
100%
100%
100%
-
97.3%
-
97.8%
73
100%
99%
99%
99%
98%
99.1%
97.5%
74
95.1%
96.8%
-
-
-
-
97.3%
75
98.3%
98.6%
98.6%
95.2%
95.7%
95.9%
96.4%
76
-
84.6%
88.2%
87.9%
92.1%
94.8%
96.3%
77
15.3%
-
45.1%
96.5%
95.4%
94.4%
95.9%
78
68.6%
-
57.8%
-
96.6%
97.4%
95.6%
79
-
97.7%
96.8%
94.9%
93.5%
-
95%
80
-
-
93.1%
-
-
-
94.6%
81
-
96.5%
97.8%
-
97.8%
92.4%
93.9%
82
73.5%
-
54%
-
90.8%
-
92.3%
83
-
-
-
-
-
-
91.5%
84
75%
86.1%
83.5%
90.1%
90%
-
91.5%
85
-
-
-
-
-
-
90.3%
86
94.3%
96.9%
98.9%
-
86%
88.2%
89.7%
87
85.8%
-
-
-
86.8%
-
88.3%
88
-
20.6%
-
85.9%
85.7%
85.7%
87.2%
89
97.2%
98.3%
98.2%
98.8%
85.1%
-
86.6%
90
-
44.3%
56.5%
46.9%
82.9%
82.9%
85.4%
91
76.5%
76.6%
77.1%
77.2%
69.7%
82%
84.5%
92
85.2%
-
-
82.7%
82.7%
81%
83.5%
93
82.2%
82.1%
81.3%
80.9%
80.3%
79.7%
82.2%
94
78.9%
-
32.5%
-
79.7%
-
82.2%
95
94.7%
82.2%
84.1%
-
83.8%
78.4%
80.9%
96
83.8%
81.2%
91.5%
78%
-
-
80.5%
97
-
41.7%
41.7%
91.2%
92.5%
77.5%
80%
98
55.4%
52.7%
75.1%
77.2%
77.4%
-
79.9%
99
72.4%
72.8%
72.8%
72.8%
75.7%
76.1%
78.6%
100
67.2%
-
-
-
75%
-
77.5%
101
76%
69.7%
70.2%
75.3%
70.6%
75%
77.5%
102
42.8%
-
44.3%
-
73.8%
-
76.3%
103
78%
79.1%
74.1%
66.4%
73.7%
72.7%
75.2%
104
33.5%
33.6%
42%
31.6%
69.6%
72.6%
75.1%
105
98.8%
98.3%
99.5%
-
71%
-
73.5%
106
66.5%
67.7%
69.6%
70.1%
69.8%
68.1%
71.6%
107
-
-
-
58.5%
63.3%
61.3%
71.1%
108
48.6%
54.9%
57.5%
60.6%
63.9%
66.3%
69.8%
109
27%
-
42%
-
66.2%
-
69.7%
110
-
-
-
-
65.4%
-
68.9%
111
69.1%
66.5%
66.9%
69.8%
67.8%
64.2%
67.7%
112
66.3%
64.6%
62.7%
62.5%
62.5%
-
66%
113
-
31.6%
-
12.1%
19.2%
27.3%
62.4%
114
-
-
-
-
-
-
62.2%
115
-
53.5%
50.7%
53.8%
54.8%
55.1%
58.6%
116
41.9%
-
38.2%
-
54.9%
-
58.4%
117
44.4%
47.5%
51.5%
53.3%
-
-
56.8%
118
16.8%
18.9%
22.1%
28.1%
29.8%
42.7%
56.8%
119
-
-
-
51.4%
-
-
54.9%
120
40.7%
41%
42.8%
45.9%
47.8%
50.3%
53.8%
121
54.3%
53.7%
50.6%
48.3%
46.3%
47.5%
51.6%
122
-
-
-
0%
-
47%
51%
123
-
-
-
-
42.9%
45.6%
49.6%
124
38.4%
-
51.1%
-
44.9%
-
48.9%
125
-
-
-
-
43.1%
-
47.1%
126
47.9%
47.9%
-
47.9%
42.4%
-
46.4%
127
22.1%
-
41.9%
-
-
-
45.9%
128
100%
-
10.1%
-
39.4%
-
43.4%
129
51.5%
-
37.9%
-
-
-
41.9%
130
81.5%
-
88.3%
-
37.8%
-
41.8%
131
37.4%
-
-
-
-
-
41.4%
132
21.4%
31.5%
32.2%
32.2%
35.4%
36.1%
40.1%
133
27.9%
-
-
-
34.6%
-
38.6%
134
32.3%
-
-
-
-
-
36.3%
135
31.1%
-
-
-
-
-
35.1%
136
-
-
-
-
-
-
34.8%
137
-
22.7%
14.4%
25.8%
33%
29.9%
33.9%
138
-
-
-
-
-
29.5%
33.5%
139
-
-
-
30.7%
28.8%
-
32.8%
140
69.7%
-
-
14.9%
27.1%
-
31.1%
141
92.6%
92.6%
26.1%
26.1%
25%
-
29%
142
69.4%
-
-
23.2%
23.2%
24.8%
28.8%
143
-
-
-
50.6%
72.7%
22.1%
26.1%
144
-
-
-
-
-
11.1%
21.7%
145
11.3%
-
-
17.3%
-
-
21.3%
146
-
-
-
16.7%
-
-
20.7%
147
49%
54.3%
83%
-
15.4%
-
19.4%
148
-
-
-
-
-
-
18.4%
149
-
-
-
-
-
-
18%
150
13.2%
-
-
-
-
-
17.2%
151
27.3%
28.5%
18.6%
18.8%
23.4%
12.5%
16.5%
152
-
-
-
-
-
-
16.2%
153
-
-
-
-
8%
11.4%
16.2%
154
-
2.3%
2.6%
3.3%
2%
11.4%
15.4%
155
21.2%
21.9%
22.5%
10.6%
8.6%
10%
14.5%
156
70%
70%
100%
100%
10%
-
14%
157
9%
-
-
-
-
-
13%
158
-
8.2%
-
-
-
-
12.2%
159
-
7.3%
-
-
-
8%
12%
160
-
-
8.8%
5.3%
5.5%
7.3%
11.3%
161
-
-
-
-
-
-
11%
162
-
-
-
-
6.2%
-
10.2%
163
4.6%
-
-
-
-
-
8.6%
164
0.5%
-
-
3%
3.9%
3.9%
7.9%
165
-
-
-
-
-
-
7.5%
166
2%
-
2%
-
3.1%
2.3%
6.3%
167
8.5%
-
-
1.9%
1.8%
-
5.8%
168
1.8%
1.6%
1%
1.6%
1.5%
1.6%
5.6%
169
46.2%
-
-
-
-
1%
5%
170
6%
4.3%
0.6%
-
0.9%
0.8%
4.8%
171
-
-
0%
-
1.5%
0.8%
4.8%
172
-
-
-
-
-
-
4.5%
173
0%
-
-
-
-
-
4%
174
-
-
-
-
-
-
4%
175
-
-
-
-
-
-
4%
176
100%
100%
-
0%
0%
0%
4%
Methodology
Data Quality Notes
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which countries have achieved universal or near-universal computer access in primary schools?
A: As of 2026, approximately 30-40 countries have achieved or will maintain 95%+ computer access in their primary schools. This group includes most high-income developed nations (Nordic countries, Western Europe, North America, Australia), Gulf states (UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia), and several upper-middle-income countries that have prioritized digital education infrastructure. Primary schools typically have lower computer access rates than secondary schools due to infrastructure investment priorities and the greater complexity of deploying technology at the primary level.
Q: Why do primary schools often have lower computer access than secondary schools?
A: Primary schools typically have lower computer access rates than secondary schools for several reasons. First, governments often prioritize secondary school digitalization as these schools prepare students for university and professional environments where digital skills are essential. Second, primary schools serve younger students who require different technology approaches and more supervision. Third, primary schools are more numerous and geographically dispersed, making infrastructure deployment more costly. Fourth, the lower academic level of primary education creates less immediate demand for computer-based resources compared to secondary schools.
Q: How has computer access in primary schools changed since 2000?
A: Computer access in primary schools has expanded significantly since 2000, though with substantial regional variation. High-income countries have moved from 40-60% coverage in 2000 to 90%+ by 2026. Upper-middle-income countries have progressed from 5-15% to 60-75%. Lower-middle-income countries have grown from near-zero to 25-45%. Low-income countries remain challenged, progressing from near-zero to 5-20% coverage. Global factors driving this expansion include: (1) dramatic decline in computer equipment costs, (2) mobile device adoption as alternative to traditional computers, (3) government digital education initiatives and policies, (4) COVID-19 pandemic accelerating school digitalization (2020-2023), and (5) international development support for education infrastructure.
Data Disclaimer: Projected data (future years) are estimates based on mathematical models. Actual values may differ. Learn about our methodology →
Sources
-
Updated: 05.03.2026https://databrowser.uis.unesco.org/browser/EDUCATION/UIS-SDG4Monitoring
Please log in to leave a comment.
Log in
(0) Comments