Environmental Education in Schools by Country

Environmental education in schools measures how well countries integrate environmental and sustainability topics into their education systems. This indicator reflects policy frameworks, curriculum integration, teacher training, and institutional practices that promote environmental awareness and sustainable development education.

Understanding Environmental Education Integration

Environmental education in schools is measured through a composite indicator developed by UNESCO that assesses the extent to which countries integrate environmental and sustainability education into their national education systems. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating stronger integration of environmental topics, climate change education, sustainable development principles, and sustainable practices into curricula, teacher training, school operations, and education policies.

This indicator captures multiple dimensions of environmental education: policy frameworks that mandate sustainability education, curriculum content addressing environmental challenges and solutions, teacher training in environmental and sustainability topics, school infrastructure and operations that model sustainable practices, and student engagement in environmental action and projects. Unlike simple measures of environmental awareness, this comprehensive score reflects systemic integration of sustainability throughout education systems.

The global landscape shows remarkable diversity. Norway (85.7%) and Gambia (87.3%) lead the world, demonstrating that strong environmental education can exist in both high-income and low-income contexts. Indonesia (83.4%), Ireland (75.4%), and Sweden (75.9%) also show exceptional performance. Many countries cluster in the 50-70% range, indicating moderate integration, while some nations score below 30%, suggesting limited systematic environmental education despite growing global awareness of climate and sustainability challenges.

Environmental Education in Schools by Country

Export

Excel (.xlsx) CSV Document PDF Document PNG Image

#	Country	2023 Score (%)
1	Gambia GM	87.3%
2	Norway NO	85.7%
3	Indonesia ID	83.4%
4	Liechtenstein LI	76.4%
5	Sweden SE	75.9%
6	Ireland IE	75.4%
7	Slovenia SI	74.1%
8	Australia AU	73.2%
9	China CN	72.7%
10	Kenya KE	72.6%
11	Hungary HU	72.3%
12	Estonia EE	71.4%
13	Latvia LV	71.2%
14	Venezuela VE	71.2%
15	South Sudan SS	71%
16	Papua New Guinea PG	70.9%
17	Vietnam VN	70.8%
18	Bhutan BT	70.3%
19	Kyrgyzstan KG	69.6%
20	Japan JP	69.4%
21	Panama PA	69.1%
22	Cameroon CM	68.9%
23	Dominican Republic DO	68.7%
24	Costa Rica CR	68.3%
25	Maldives MV	67.6%
26	Philippines PH	66.8%
27	Uruguay UY	66.8%
28	Peru PE	66.4%
29	South Korea KR	65.9%
30	Canada CA	65.4%
31	Belize BZ	65.1%
32	India IN	64.7%
33	Spain ES	63.6%
34	Thailand TH	63.6%
35	Argentina AR	62.9%
36	Bulgaria BG	62.9%
37	Denmark DK	62%
38	Malta MT	61.9%
39	Bahamas BS	61.6%
40	Lesotho LS	60.9%
41	Zambia ZM	60.4%
42	Sierra Leone SL	59.5%
43	Slovakia SK	59.4%
44	Azerbaijan AZ	58.6%
45	Kazakhstan KZ	58.6%
46	Jamaica JM	57.8%
47	Pakistan PK	57.2%
48	Qatar QA	56.8%
49	Mauritius MU	56.1%
50	Liberia LR	55.6%
51	Portugal PT	55.6%
52	Sri Lanka LK	55.6%
53	Ghana GH	55.2%
54	France FR	55.1%
55	Türkiye TR	54.7%
56	Mexico MX	54.3%
57	United Kingdom GB	52%
58	Armenia AM	51.1%
59	Seychelles SC	50.7%
60	Tanzania TZ	50.4%
61	United Arab Emirates AE	49.5%
62	Saudi Arabia SA	48.2%
63	Cape Verde CV	48.1%
64	Rwanda RW	48.1%
65	Botswana BW	47.2%
66	New Zealand NZ	46.6%
67	Honduras HN	46.3%
68	Georgia GE	46%
69	Italy IT	45.9%
70	Ecuador EC	45.1%
71	Cyprus CY	45%
72	Brazil BR	44.7%
73	Senegal SN	44.6%
74	Colombia CO	44.2%
75	Lithuania LT	43.8%
76	Singapore SG	43.7%
77	Paraguay PY	43.5%
78	Poland PL	43.2%
79	Uganda UG	42.9%
80	Guyana GY	42.4%
81	Palestine PS	40.1%
82	Oman OM	39.8%
83	Chile CL	39.3%
84	Timor-Leste TL	39.2%
85	Romania RO	38.4%
86	Saint Kitts and Nevis KN	37.7%
87	DR Congo CD	37.2%
88	Myanmar MM	35.4%
89	Marshall Islands MH	34.8%
90	Greece GR	34.6%
91	South Africa ZA	34.6%
92	Nigeria NG	34.5%
93	Algeria DZ	33.9%
94	Dominica DM	32.2%
95	Samoa WS	30.9%
96	Bolivia BO	30.2%
97	Kuwait KW	29.1%
98	Cuba CU	27%
99	Morocco MA	25.2%
100	Madagascar MG	24.3%
101	Saint Vincent and the Grenadines VC	20.6%
102	Cook Islands CK	20.4%
103	Zimbabwe ZW	16.2%
104	Ivory Coast CI	15.2%
105	Haiti HT	14.2%
106	Finland FI	11.9%
107	Burkina Faso BF	9.2%
108	Mongolia MN	7.6%

Regional Patterns in Environmental Education

European countries show highly varied performance in environmental education integration. Nordic nations like Norway (85.7%) and Sweden (75.9%) lead the region, reflecting long-standing commitments to environmental education and sustainability. Ireland (75.4%), Slovenia (74.1%), and Estonia (71.4%) also perform strongly. However, other European countries show surprisingly moderate scores: Finland (11.9%), despite its renowned education system, scores very low, while Poland (43.2%), Lithuania (43.8%), and Greece (34.6%) show limited integration. This variation suggests different national priorities and approaches to environmental education across Europe.

Asian and Pacific countries demonstrate strong commitment to environmental education. Indonesia (83.4%) achieves the second-highest global score, reflecting national emphasis on environmental education in this climate-vulnerable archipelago. Other strong performers include China (72.7%), Kenya (72.6%), Hungary (72.3%), and Vietnam (70.8%). Japan (69.4%), South Korea (66.0%), and India (64.7%) show solid performance. Papua New Guinea (70.9%) and South Sudan (71.0%) demonstrate that even countries facing development challenges can prioritize environmental education.

Latin American and Caribbean countries show moderate to strong performance. Belize (65.1%), Costa Rica (68.3%), and Peru (66.4%) lead the region, reflecting these countries' rich biodiversity and environmental awareness. Dominican Republic (68.7%), Panama (69.1%), and Uruguay (66.8%) also perform well. However, some countries like Chile (39.3%), Cuba (27.0%), and Bolivia (30.2%) show lower scores, suggesting uneven regional commitment to systematic environmental education despite shared environmental challenges.

African countries display the widest variation globally. Gambia (87.3%) achieves the world's highest score, while Cameroon (68.9%), Kenya (72.6%), and Ghana (55.2%) show strong performance. However, many African countries score low: Burkina Faso (9.2%), Mongolia (7.6%), Haiti (14.2%), Ivory Coast (15.2%), and Zimbabwe (16.2%) indicate very limited integration of environmental education. This variation reflects different national capacities, priorities, and resources available for education system development.

Middle Eastern countries show moderate performance overall. United Arab Emirates (49.5%), Saudi Arabia (48.2%), and Qatar (56.8%) demonstrate growing attention to environmental education despite being oil-producing nations. However, Kuwait (29.1%) and Oman (39.8%) lag behind Gulf neighbors. The region faces unique challenges in promoting environmental education while managing economies dependent on fossil fuel extraction.

Factors Influencing Environmental Education Integration

National policy frameworks play a crucial role in environmental education integration. Countries with explicit national policies mandating environmental and sustainability education throughout curricula tend to score higher. Norway, Indonesia, and Gambia have all established comprehensive policy frameworks that require environmental topics across grade levels and subjects. These policies provide clear direction for curriculum developers, teacher trainers, and school administrators, ensuring systematic rather than ad hoc environmental education.

Environmental vulnerability and awareness significantly influence scores. Countries facing immediate climate threats—small island states vulnerable to sea level rise, nations experiencing severe droughts or floods, countries with threatened biodiversity—often prioritize environmental education. Indonesia's high score reflects awareness of climate vulnerability in this archipelagic nation. Similarly, Costa Rica's strong performance aligns with its environmental conservation leadership and ecotourism economy.

Teacher training and capacity determine implementation quality. Even with strong policies and curricula, environmental education requires teachers equipped to deliver content effectively. Countries investing in teacher professional development in environmental and sustainability topics achieve higher scores. This includes pre-service teacher education incorporating environmental pedagogy and in-service training updating teachers on current environmental challenges and teaching approaches.

Resource availability and education system capacity affect environmental education integration. Wealthier countries can invest more in curriculum development, teacher training, educational materials, and sustainable school infrastructure. However, the relationship is not deterministic—Gambia achieves the world's highest score despite limited resources, while some wealthy nations score moderately. What matters most is political commitment and strategic prioritization of environmental education within available resources.

Cultural attitudes toward environment and education shape outcomes. Societies with strong environmental traditions, indigenous knowledge systems valuing nature, or cultural emphasis on intergenerational responsibility tend to embrace environmental education more readily. Countries where environmental protection is politically contentious or economically threatening may resist systematic environmental education despite global pressure.

Implications of Environmental Education

Environmental literacy and awareness represent the most direct outcomes of environmental education. Students exposed to comprehensive environmental education develop better understanding of ecological systems, climate change causes and impacts, biodiversity importance, and sustainability principles. This knowledge foundation enables informed decision-making and environmental citizenship throughout life. Countries with strong environmental education integration are building populations better equipped to address environmental challenges.

Behavioral change and sustainable practices emerge from effective environmental education. Students learning about environmental issues and solutions are more likely to adopt sustainable behaviors: reducing waste, conserving energy and water, choosing sustainable transportation, and making environmentally conscious consumption decisions. These individual behaviors aggregate into significant environmental impacts, particularly as educated youth influence family practices and eventually become adult decision-makers.

Economic opportunities in green sectors benefit from environmental education. As economies transition toward sustainability, demand grows for workers with environmental knowledge and skills. Countries investing in greening education are preparing workforces for green jobs in renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, environmental management, green building, and circular economy sectors. This creates competitive advantage in emerging green industries.

Climate adaptation and resilience improve through environmental education. Countries facing climate impacts need populations that understand risks and adaptation strategies. Environmental education builds capacity for community-level climate adaptation, disaster preparedness, and resilient livelihoods. This is particularly crucial for vulnerable countries where climate impacts threaten development gains.

Democratic participation and environmental governance strengthen when citizens understand environmental issues. Environmental education enables informed public discourse about environmental policies, climate action, and sustainability trade-offs. This supports more effective environmental governance and democratic accountability on environmental issues. Countries with strong environmental education develop more engaged environmental constituencies.

Challenges in Environmental Education Integration

Curriculum overcrowding presents a major obstacle to environmental education integration. Education systems face competing demands to include numerous topics: literacy, numeracy, science, technology, arts, health, citizenship, and more. Adding comprehensive environmental education requires difficult choices about curriculum priorities and time allocation. Some countries address this through integration—incorporating environmental topics across existing subjects rather than creating separate environmental courses.

Teacher capacity and training gaps limit implementation. Many teachers lack training in environmental and sustainability topics, particularly teachers educated before environmental education became a priority. Providing quality professional development to large teaching workforces requires sustained investment. Additionally, environmental education requires interdisciplinary approaches that challenge traditional subject-based teacher training and school organization.

Resource constraints affect environmental education, particularly in low-income countries. Developing environmental curricula, creating teaching materials, training teachers, and implementing sustainable school practices all require resources. Countries struggling to provide basic education infrastructure face difficult trade-offs between expanding access and improving quality through environmental education integration.

Political and economic resistance can undermine environmental education. In countries where economies depend on environmentally harmful industries, environmental education may face opposition from vested interests. Climate change education particularly faces political resistance in some contexts where climate science is contested. Overcoming this resistance requires political leadership and broad stakeholder engagement.

Measurement and assessment challenges complicate environmental education evaluation. Unlike literacy or numeracy, environmental knowledge and attitudes are harder to assess systematically. The UNESCO indicator captures policy and systemic integration but doesn't directly measure student learning outcomes or behavioral change. Developing robust assessment frameworks for environmental education remains an ongoing challenge.

Strategies for Strengthening Environmental Education

Policy frameworks and national commitments provide essential foundations. Countries seeking to strengthen greening education should develop explicit national policies mandating environmental and sustainability education throughout education systems. These policies should specify learning objectives, curriculum requirements, teacher training expectations, and implementation timelines. Policy frameworks create accountability and ensure systematic rather than voluntary environmental education.

Curriculum integration across subjects offers an effective approach. Rather than creating separate environmental courses competing for limited curriculum time, integrating environmental topics across existing subjects—science, social studies, mathematics, language arts—ensures broader coverage and reinforces environmental concepts through multiple contexts. This approach also reflects the interdisciplinary nature of environmental challenges.

Teacher professional development must be prioritized. Investing in both pre-service teacher education and in-service professional development ensures teachers have knowledge, skills, and confidence to deliver environmental education effectively. This includes content knowledge about environmental issues, pedagogical approaches for environmental education, and resources for classroom implementation.

School operations and infrastructure can model sustainability. Green schools that implement sustainable practices—renewable energy, waste reduction, water conservation, school gardens, green spaces—provide living laboratories for environmental education. Students learn more effectively when schools model the sustainable practices being taught, creating alignment between curriculum and lived experience.

Community engagement and partnerships strengthen environmental education. Connecting schools with environmental organizations, local communities, indigenous knowledge holders, and environmental professionals enriches learning and creates authentic contexts for environmental education. Community partnerships also build broader support for environmental education and create pathways for student environmental action beyond classrooms.