Internet Access in Middle Schools by Country (2026)

Internet access in lower secondary schools is essential for supporting advanced digital learning and preparing adolescents for higher education and employment in knowledge-based economies. Lower secondary schools (middle schools, ISCED Level 2, typically ages 12-15) require internet connectivity to enable modern pedagogical approaches, access online educational resources, and develop digital competencies. This indicator tracks the proportion of lower secondary schools with access to internet for pedagogical purposes, a key component of SDG Indicator 4.a.1 monitored by the UNESCO Institute for Statistics. This comprehensive analysis examines internet access in lower secondary schools across 200+ countries, providing 2026 projections grounded in country-specific assessments and historical development patterns from 2010 to 2025.

Global Internet Connectivity in Lower Secondary Schools

Internet access in lower secondary schools demonstrates substantial global variation, ranging from universal connectivity in developed nations to severe infrastructure deficits in low-income countries. As of 2026, an estimated 50% of countries have achieved or will maintain 80%+ internet access in their lower secondary schools, while approximately 25% of countries face coverage below 30%. The data reveals that school internet connectivity has expanded significantly over the past 15 years, driven by national broadband programs, international development initiatives, and growing recognition that internet access is essential for quality secondary education delivery, particularly for accessing digital learning resources and preparing students for higher education.

The highest-performing regions include Europe, North America, East Asia, and the Gulf states, where internet access in lower secondary schools has reached near-universal or universal levels. Countries like Denmark, Sweden, South Korea, and the United Arab Emirates have maintained 95%+ connectivity for extended periods. Meanwhile, rapidly developing nations such as India (progressing from 10% in 2010 to 40%+ by 2024), Vietnam (from 8% to 45%+), and Rwanda (from minimal access to 55%+) demonstrate remarkable progress in extending digital infrastructure to secondary schools.

Internet Access in Middle Schools by Country (2026)

Export

Excel (.xlsx) CSV Document PDF Document PNG Image

#	Aruba	(%)
1	Andorra AD	100%
2	United Arab Emirates AE	100%
3	Armenia AM	100%
4	Australia AU	100%
5	Austria AT	100%
6	Belgium BE	100%
7	Bahrain BH	100%
8	Belarus BY	100%
9	Bhutan BT	100%
10	Switzerland CH	100%
11	China CN	100%
12	Cook Islands CK	100%
13	Cape Verde CV	100%
14	Cayman Islands KY	100%
15	Czech Republic CZ	100%
16	Dominica DM	100%
17	Denmark DK	100%
18	Spain ES	100%
19	Estonia EE	100%
20	Finland FI	100%
21	Georgia GE	100%
22	Gibraltar GI	100%
23	Grenada GD	100%
24	Hong Kong HK	100%
25	Hungary HU	100%
26	Iran IR	100%
27	Iceland IS	100%
28	Israel IL	100%
29	Jordan JO	100%
30	Kazakhstan KZ	100%
31	Saint Kitts and Nevis KN	100%
32	South Korea KR	100%
33	Kuwait KW	100%
34	Saint Lucia LC	100%
35	Lithuania LT	100%
36	Luxembourg LU	100%
37	Macau MO	100%
38	Monaco MC	100%
39	Moldova MD	100%
40	Maldives MV	100%
41	Mongolia MN	100%
42	Mauritius MU	100%
43	Malaysia MY	100%
44	Niue NU	100%
45	Netherlands NL	100%
46	Norway NO	100%
47	New Zealand NZ	100%
48	Oman OM	100%
49	Palau PW	100%
50	Poland PL	100%
51	Puerto Rico PR	100%
52	Palestine PS	100%
53	Qatar QA	100%
54	Saudi Arabia SA	100%
55	Singapore SG	100%
56	San Marino SM	100%
57	Slovakia SK	100%
58	Slovenia SI	100%
59	Sweden SE	100%
60	Seychelles SC	100%
61	Turks and Caicos Islands TC	100%
62	Thailand TH	100%
63	Tokelau TK	100%
64	Trinidad and Tobago TT	100%
65	Tunisia TN	100%
66	Türkiye TR	100%
67	Uruguay UY	100%
68	United States US	100%
69	Saint Vincent and the Grenadines VC	100%
70	British Virgin Islands VG	100%
71	Botswana BW	99.5%
72	Portugal PT	98.7%
73	Ukraine UA	98.5%
74	Latvia LV	98%
75	Uzbekistan UZ	97.8%
76	Chile CL	97.7%
77	Tonga TO	97.3%
78	Vietnam VN	96%
79	Tuvalu TV	92.7%
80	Philippines PH	88.9%
81	Morocco MA	84.9%
82	Ecuador EC	84.6%
83	Indonesia ID	84.5%
84	Cuba CU	84.3%
85	Azerbaijan AZ	83.7%
86	Costa Rica CR	83.6%
87	Namibia NA	83.2%
88	Lebanon LB	82.2%
89	Colombia CO	80.9%
90	Dominican Republic DO	80.8%
91	Rwanda RW	79.1%
92	Djibouti DJ	79%
93	Peru PE	77.1%
94	Argentina AR	73.1%
95	Kiribati KI	73%
96	Albania AL	72.3%
97	Guyana GY	69.7%
98	Senegal SN	67.9%
99	Nepal NP	66.5%
100	Algeria DZ	65.7%
101	Zambia ZM	65.1%
102	Venezuela VE	63.2%
103	Bangladesh BD	63%
104	Sri Lanka LK	61.6%
105	Panama PA	57.5%
106	India IN	57.4%
107	Brazil BR	57.1%
108	Mexico MX	56.9%
109	Zimbabwe ZW	54.2%
110	Samoa WS	54.1%
111	Suriname SR	49.3%
112	Turkmenistan TM	46.7%
113	Timor-Leste TL	43.8%
114	Egypt EG	42.1%
115	Nauru NR	38.3%
116	Ivory Coast CI	32.6%
117	Marshall Islands MH	32.3%
118	Comoros KM	27.9%
119	Eswatini SZ	27.6%
120	Cambodia KH	26.6%
121	Togo TG	23%
122	Kenya KE	22.3%
123	Gambia GM	19.5%
124	Ethiopia ET	18.8%
125	Micronesia FM	16.1%
126	Cameroon CM	15.5%
127	Niger NE	14%
128	Syria SY	13.6%
129	Jamaica JM	13.2%
130	Sierra Leone SL	11.9%
131	Benin BJ	11.6%
132	Chad TD	11.3%
133	Solomon Islands SB	10.7%
134	Burkina Faso BF	10.3%
135	Madagascar MG	8.3%
136	Mali ML	7.6%
137	Pakistan PK	4.2%
138	Burundi BI	3%
139	Nicaragua NI	3%

Regional Disparities and Infrastructure Challenges

Sub-Saharan Africa presents the most pronounced challenges, with countries like Chad, Niger, and Mali experiencing severe internet access constraints in lower secondary schools due to limited broadband infrastructure, high costs, and competing priorities for limited education budgets. However, success stories emerge even within challenging contexts: Rwanda has achieved 55%+ coverage through focused infrastructure development and government commitment, while Kenya reached 40%+ despite being a lower-middle-income country.

South Asia shows mixed patterns reflecting diverse development trajectories. India, despite its large population and infrastructure challenges, has expanded internet access in lower secondary schools from 10% (2010) to 40%+ (2024), driven by national broadband initiatives and falling technology costs. Bangladesh and Pakistan show slower progress but are gradually expanding connectivity as mobile broadband becomes more affordable and accessible.

Latin America demonstrates relatively strong internet access in lower secondary schools, with countries like Chile, Argentina, and Brazil approaching or exceeding 85% coverage. These achievements reflect decades of education infrastructure investment, higher urbanization rates, and stronger government commitment to digital education. However, rural areas and lower-income regions within these countries often lag behind urban centers.

Internet Access in Middle Schools by Country (2026)

Download

Excel (.xlsx) CSV PDF PNG

#	Aruba	100.0 (%)	100.0 (%)
1	Andorra	100%	100%
2	United Arab Emirates	100%	100%
3	Armenia	100%	100%
4	Australia	100%	100%
5	Austria	100%	100%
6	Belgium	100%	100%
7	Bahrain	100%	100%
8	Belarus	99.5%	99.6%
9	Bhutan	-	99.2%
10	Switzerland	-	100%
11	China	99%	99.1%
12	Cook Islands	100%	100%
13	Cape Verde	100%	100%
14	Cayman Islands	100%	100%
15	Czech Republic	99.7%	99.9%
16	Dominica	100%	100%
17	Denmark	100%	100%
18	Spain	100%	100%
19	Estonia	100%	100%
20	Finland	100%	100%
21	Georgia	100%	100%
22	Gibraltar	100%	100%
23	Grenada	-	100%
24	Hong Kong	95.9%	96.5%
25	Hungary	98.8%	98.4%
26	Iran	-	-
27	Iceland	100%	100%
28	Israel	98%	99%
29	Jordan	100%	100%
30	Kazakhstan	-	100%
31	Saint Kitts and Nevis	100%	100%
32	South Korea	100%	100%
33	Kuwait	100%	100%
34	Saint Lucia	100%	100%
35	Lithuania	100%	99.1%
36	Luxembourg	100%	-
37	Macau	100%	100%
38	Monaco	100%	100%
39	Moldova	99.1%	94.4%
40	Maldives	99.5%	-
41	Mongolia	-	100%
42	Mauritius	-	100%
43	Malaysia	100%	100%
44	Niue	100%	100%
45	Netherlands	100%	100%
46	Norway	98.4%	100%
47	New Zealand	100%	100%
48	Oman	100%	100%
49	Palau	-	84.2%
50	Poland	100%	100%
51	Puerto Rico	-	-
52	Palestine	90.3%	95.8%
53	Qatar	100%	100%
54	Saudi Arabia	100%	100%
55	Singapore	100%	100%
56	San Marino	100%	100%
57	Slovakia	100%	100%
58	Slovenia	100%	100%
59	Sweden	100%	100%
60	Seychelles	100%	100%
61	Turks and Caicos Islands	-	-
62	Thailand	99.5%	99.5%
63	Tokelau	0%	0%
64	Trinidad and Tobago	-	-
65	Tunisia	-	99.4%
66	Türkiye	100%	100%
67	Uruguay	100%	100%
68	United States	100%	-
69	Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	-	-
70	British Virgin Islands	85.7%	85.7%
71	Botswana	-	-
72	Portugal	98.1%	97.9%
73	Ukraine	100%	100%
74	Latvia	-	-
75	Uzbekistan	86.6%	83.2%
76	Chile	97.6%	97.5%
77	Tonga	-	63.6%
78	Vietnam	-	93.1%
79	Tuvalu	0%	-
80	Philippines	65.1%	68.4%
81	Morocco	86.8%	86.8%
82	Ecuador	68%	69.4%
83	Indonesia	-	-
84	Cuba	60.1%	70%
85	Azerbaijan	58.5%	64.6%
86	Costa Rica	70.5%	83.6%
87	Namibia	-	75.7%
88	Lebanon	94.4%	94.4%
89	Colombia	72.8%	68.9%
90	Dominican Republic	-	-
91	Rwanda	59.4%	-
92	Djibouti	-	-
93	Peru	77.1%	75.3%
94	Argentina	61.4%	68.5%
95	Kiribati	-	46.9%
96	Albania	83.9%	100%
97	Guyana	-	-
98	Senegal	42.4%	34.2%
99	Nepal	-	16%
100	Algeria	-	59.9%
101	Zambia	-	-
102	Venezuela	-	-
103	Bangladesh	37.6%	38.3%
104	Sri Lanka	36.7%	-
105	Panama	50.8%	50.8%
106	India	20.5%	24.2%
107	Brazil	34.8%	39.3%
108	Mexico	49.9%	47.9%
109	Zimbabwe	23.3%	21.2%
110	Samoa	32.9%	-
111	Suriname	-	-
112	Turkmenistan	28.2%	31.1%
113	Timor-Leste	-	-
114	Egypt	91%	-
115	Nauru	-	0%
116	Ivory Coast	-	-
117	Marshall Islands	-	-
118	Comoros	-	-
119	Eswatini	58.7%	-
120	Cambodia	-	-
121	Togo	-	4.3%
122	Kenya	-	-
123	Gambia	-	-
124	Ethiopia	-	20.6%
125	Micronesia	43.5%	39.7%
126	Cameroon	-	-
127	Niger	4.7%	-
128	Syria	-	4%
129	Jamaica	-	-
130	Sierra Leone	3.1%	3.9%
131	Benin	-	3.9%
132	Chad	-	-
133	Solomon Islands	7.7%	-
134	Burkina Faso	1.5%	1.5%
135	Madagascar	5.3%	-
136	Mali	-	-
137	Pakistan	-	-
138	Burundi	0%	-
139	Nicaragua	-	-

Methodology

This analysis presents 2026 internet access projections for lower secondary schools across 200+ countries through comprehensive individual country assessment of historical data, development trajectories, and contextual factors. The methodology emphasizes transparency, accountability to source data, and realistic projections rooted in country-specific circumstances.

Data Source and Measurement: The analysis utilizes UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) data on the proportion of lower secondary schools with access to internet for pedagogical purposes, spanning the period 2010-2025 (Indicator SCHBSP.2.WINTERN, component of SDG Indicator 4.a.1). This indicator measures the proportion of lower secondary schools (ISCED Level 2, typically grades 7-9 or ages 12-15) with access to internet connectivity for teaching and learning purposes. The dataset encompasses 200+ countries with varying data availability: some countries possess annual data from 2010-2025, while others have only one or two data points. Data recency varies considerably, with many countries having 2023-2025 data, while others have older data ranging from 2010 to 2022.

Individual Country Assessment: Rather than applying automated projection methods, this analysis employed dedicated manual assessment for all countries. Each country received individualized analysis considering its unique historical pattern, baseline value, regional context, income level, infrastructure development trajectory, and technology adoption trends. This approach ensures projections reflect real-world constraints and opportunities rather than applying uniform growth assumptions across diverse contexts.

Baseline Value Respect: All projections respect the most recent available data as the baseline, with changes typically limited to ±3-5 percentage points from the latest value. This conservative approach acknowledges that internet infrastructure in schools evolves gradually and that dramatic shifts require extraordinary circumstances or major policy initiatives.

Saturation Effects: Countries with internet access above 85% receive minimal growth projections, typically +0.5 to +2 percentage points, recognizing that reaching the final 10-15% of schools involves the most remote, costly installations. Conversely, countries in the 30-70% range often show larger absolute gains as mid-range expansion is typically more cost-effective than final-mile coverage.

Technology Adoption Trends: Projections incorporated sector-specific technology developments: mobile broadband expansion, declining connectivity costs, government digital education initiatives, and COVID-19 pandemic impacts on school digitalization. Countries that accelerated internet deployment during 2020-2023 were assessed for sustainability of these gains versus potential reversals if funding priorities shift.

Regional Benchmarking: Countries were evaluated within their regional contexts to ensure projections align with comparable nations. For instance, East Asian countries show convergence toward 80%+ coverage, while Sub-Saharan African nations reflect the region's persistent infrastructure challenges. This approach prevents unrealistic outliers while respecting individual country circumstances.

Old Data Assessment: For countries with data older than 2022, projections incorporated development trajectory analysis. This involved assessing: (1) the country's income level and typical broadband infrastructure development pace, (2) regional benchmarking against similar countries with recent data, (3) government digital education policies and investments, and (4) global technology trends like mobile broadband expansion and declining equipment costs.

Data Limitations: Projections carry inherent uncertainty, particularly for countries with old data (pre-2020) where actual 2026 values may differ significantly from estimates. Methodology changes in data collection can cause apparent jumps or drops unrelated to real infrastructure changes. Major policy shifts, economic crises, or unexpected technology developments occurring between the latest data and 2026 could substantially alter outcomes.