Student Knowledge of Global Citizenship and Sustainability by Country

Student knowledge of global citizenship and sustainability reflects how well middle school students understand critical global issues including human rights, environmental sustainability, cultural diversity, and international cooperation. This indicator measures the percentage of lower secondary students demonstrating adequate understanding of these topics through standardized international assessments.

Understanding Student Proficiency in Global Issues

Student proficiency in global citizenship and sustainability is measured through the International Civic and Citizenship Education Study (ICCS), which assesses students' knowledge, understanding, and engagement with civic and citizenship issues. The assessment evaluates students' ability to understand global challenges, recognize diverse perspectives, and demonstrate awareness of sustainability and international cooperation.

The data reveals significant variation across 23 participating countries, with proficiency rates ranging from 38% to 69%. Countries achieving the highest proficiency rates (65-69%) include Croatia, South Korea, Sweden, Chile, and Finland, where more than two-thirds of middle school students demonstrate adequate understanding of global citizenship and sustainability concepts.

Student Knowledge of Global Citizenship and Sustainability by Country

Export

Excel (.xlsx) CSV Document PDF Document PNG Image

#	Country	2016 (%)
1	Croatia HR	69%
2	South Korea KR	69%
3	Sweden SE	68%
4	Chile CL	65%
5	Finland FI	65%
6	Norway NO	64%
7	Italy IT	62%
8	Slovenia SI	60%
9	Colombia CO	58%
10	Denmark DK	57%
11	Germany DE	57%
12	Hong Kong HK	56%
13	Bulgaria BG	55%
14	Estonia EE	54%
15	Lithuania LT	54%
16	Russia RU	52%
17	Malta MT	50%
18	Belgium BE	49%
19	Mexico MX	46%
20	Peru PE	45%
21	Netherlands NL	42%
22	Latvia LV	41%
23	Dominican Republic DO	38%

Regional Patterns and Educational Approaches

European countries show diverse results, with Nordic countries (Sweden 68%, Norway 64%, Finland 65%, Denmark 57%) generally performing well, reflecting strong civic education traditions. However, some European nations show lower proficiency, including Netherlands (42%), Latvia (41%), and Belgium (49%), indicating that geographic proximity does not guarantee similar educational outcomes.

Asian representation is limited to South Korea (69%) and Hong Kong (56%), with South Korea achieving the highest proficiency rate globally. This reflects strong emphasis on global awareness and civic education in Korean curricula. Latin American countries show varied results, with Chile (65%) performing exceptionally well while Dominican Republic (38%) and Peru (45%) face greater challenges in developing student understanding of global issues.

High-Performing Countries

Countries where more than 65% of students demonstrate adequate understanding include Croatia (69%), South Korea (69%), Sweden (68%), Chile (65%), and Finland (65%). These nations have successfully integrated global citizenship education into their curricula, providing students with comprehensive understanding of sustainability, human rights, cultural diversity, and international cooperation.

Mid-range performers (55-64%) include countries like Italy (62%), Slovenia (60%), Colombia (58%), and Germany (57%). These nations show solid but not exceptional student proficiency, suggesting room for curriculum enhancement and teaching methodology improvements to strengthen global citizenship education outcomes.

Countries Facing Challenges

Countries with proficiency rates below 50% include Dominican Republic (38%), Latvia (41%), Netherlands (42%), Peru (45%), Mexico (46%), and Belgium (49%). These nations face significant challenges in ensuring students develop adequate understanding of global citizenship and sustainability concepts. Factors may include curriculum gaps, limited teacher training in global education, resource constraints, or competing educational priorities.

The relatively low performance of Netherlands (42%) is particularly notable given the country's high overall education quality, suggesting that strong general education systems do not automatically translate to high global citizenship proficiency without specific curriculum focus and teaching approaches.

Data Context and Limitations

This data comes from the 2016 International Civic and Citizenship Education Study (ICCS), conducted by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). The assessment was administered to lower secondary students (typically Grade 8, ages 13-14) across participating countries.

The study measures student proficiency through cognitive assessments covering knowledge of civic and citizenship concepts, including global and sustainability issues. "Adequate understanding" is defined based on international benchmarks established by the ICCS framework, representing the ability to demonstrate basic to intermediate knowledge of global citizenship concepts.

Important limitations include: (1) Data is from 2016 and may not reflect current student proficiency levels, (2) Only 23 countries participated, limiting global coverage, (3) Participation was voluntary, potentially creating selection bias, (4) The assessment measures knowledge and understanding but not attitudes or behaviors, (5) Cultural and linguistic differences may affect assessment performance across countries.

More recent ICCS data collection cycles may provide updated information, but 2016 remains the most recent publicly available dataset for this specific indicator under SDG 4.7.4. The limited country coverage means many regions, particularly Africa, Middle East, and much of Asia, are not represented in this assessment.